Cornick v Cornick (No 3): FD 2001
The court considered its powers when being asked to vary a lump sum provision at the same time as a variation of maintenance. Held: ‘section 31(7B) clearly introduces a wide discretionary power to be exercised by applying the words of the statute to make by way of supplemental provision (and thus to quantify and define) … Continue reading Cornick v Cornick (No 3): FD 2001