LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – collective enfranchisement – status of appellant as witness – deferment rate – marriage value – whether participating tenants’ interests to be valued without Act rights – caretaker’s flat – whether intermediate lessee entitled to charge rent for this – held Act rights to be left out of account and no right … Continue reading Mchale v Cadogan: LT 30 Oct 2008
UTLC LEASEHOLD REFORM – collective enfranchisement – price payable – whether hope value in respect of non-participating flats including caretaker’s flat – relativity – use of graphs or adjustment to market comparables to allow for benefit of Act – effect of user restriction upon rental value of caretaker’s flat – assessment of valuation evidence and … Continue reading Cadogan and Another v Cadogan Square Ltd: UTLC 21 Apr 2011
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT . . preliminary issues – deferment rate – determination of deferment rate – Arbib v Earl Cadogan considered – deferment rate of 4.75% applied to houses and 5% applied to flats – guidance on this ( hope value – whether hope of releasing share of marriage value relevant in collective enfranchisement – … Continue reading Cadogan and Another v Sportelli and Another: LT 15 Sep 2006
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT- hope value- held hope value excluded- Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 Sch 6 para 3 – costs. Citations: [2007] EWLands LRA – 25 – 2007 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.262241
The House considered the basis of valuation on an acquisition of the freehold reversion of a lease under the 1967 Act of the three elements, the rent, vacant possession after the lease, and the marriage or hope value of the two interests when merged, and particularly the last. Held: In relation to a valuation under … Continue reading Earl Cadogan v Pitts and Wang; Similar: HL 10 Dec 2008