Thomas Charles Andrews and In the Matter of Criminal Justice Act 1988: CA 25 Feb 1999
. .
Search Results for: Criminal Justice Act 1988 25
In re Andrews: CA 25 Feb 1999
Interesting and difficult question in an arcane field at the intersection of the old equitable remedy of receivership and the modern procedures of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 designed to combat serious crime. The problem in a nutshell is this: if a receiver is appointed under that Act to receive and manage a defendant’s property … Continue reading In re Andrews: CA 25 Feb 1999
Regina v Telford Justices, ex parte Badhan: CACD 1991
The defendant was accused of a sexual offence alleged to have been committed some 15 years earlier. He asked the magistrates to dismiss the charge as an abuse of process, and now appealed their refusal. Held: The onus was on the accused to show, to a civil standard that a fair trial could not now … Continue reading Regina v Telford Justices, ex parte Badhan: CACD 1991
Regina v Walsall Justices, ex parte W (a minor): QBD 1990
A youth was charged with causing grievous bodily harm. His trial was fixed for 11 October 1988. On the date of trial, the prosecution applied for an adjournment on the grounds that, if the trial proceeded immediately and the magistrates decided that the victim did not have sufficient understanding to take the oath by reason … Continue reading Regina v Walsall Justices, ex parte W (a minor): QBD 1990
Regina v Mack: 15 Dec 1988
Supreme Court of Canada Appellant testified at his trial for drug trafficking and, at the close of his defence, brought an application for a stay of proceedings on the basis of entrapment. His testimony indicated that he had persistently refused the approaches of a police informer over the course of six months, and that he … Continue reading Regina v Mack: 15 Dec 1988
Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (‘Spycatcher’): HL 13 Oct 1988
Loss of Confidentiality Protection – public domain A retired secret service employee sought to publish his memoirs from Australia. The British government sought to restrain publication there, and the defendants sought to report those proceedings, which would involve publication of the allegations made. The AG sought to restrain those publications. Held: A duty of confidence … Continue reading Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (‘Spycatcher’): HL 13 Oct 1988
Bourgass and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 29 Jul 2015
The Court considered the procedures when a prisoner is kept in solitary confinement, otherwise described as ‘segregation’ or ‘removal from association’, and principally whether decisions to keep the appellants in segregation for substantial periods were taken lawfully. Held: The segregation was not authorised by the applicable legislation: ‘rule 45 . . (1) enables the governor … Continue reading Bourgass and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 29 Jul 2015
Regina v Montila and Others: HL 25 Nov 2004
The defendants faced charges under the two Acts. They raised as a preliminary issue whether it is necessary for the Crown to prove that the property being converted was in fact the proceeds, in the case of the 1994 Act, of drug trafficking and, in the case of the 1988 Act, of crime. The Crown … Continue reading Regina v Montila and Others: HL 25 Nov 2004
Hickey and others v Independent Assessor: CA 25 Feb 2004
Application for leave to appeal on measure of award of compensation for long time spent in prison as a result of miscarriage of justice. Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 340 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1988 133 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – Regina (on the Application of O’Brien, Hickey, Hickey) v Independent … Continue reading Hickey and others v Independent Assessor: CA 25 Feb 2004
Hashman and Harrup v The United Kingdom: ECHR 25 Nov 1999
The defendants had been required to enter into a recognisance to be of good behaviour after disrupting a hunt by blowing of a hunting horn. They were found to have unlawfully caused danger to the dogs. Though there had been no breach of the peace, they had acted contrac bonos mores. They complained that the … Continue reading Hashman and Harrup v The United Kingdom: ECHR 25 Nov 1999
Kelly (A Minor) v British Broadcasting Corporation: FD 25 Jul 2000
K, aged 16, had left home to join what was said to be a religious sect. His whereabouts were unknown. He had been made a ward of court and the Official Solicitor was appointed to represent his interests. He had sent messages to say that he was well and did not wish to return. The … Continue reading Kelly (A Minor) v British Broadcasting Corporation: FD 25 Jul 2000
Regina v Frank Adam Moran (Attorney General’s Reference No 25 of 2001): CACD 27 Jul 2001
The defendant pleaded guilty to making false statements, and cheating the public revenue by understating his profits as a market trader over a protracted period. The judge made a confiscation order equal to the amount of undeclared profit. On appeal, that element was set aside. The section referred to the pecuniary advantage obtained by the … Continue reading Regina v Frank Adam Moran (Attorney General’s Reference No 25 of 2001): CACD 27 Jul 2001
Morgentaler v Regina: 28 Jan 1988
Supreme Court of Canada – Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Life, liberty and security of the person — Fundamental justice — Abortion — Criminal Code prohibiting abortion except where life or health of woman endangered — Whether or not abortion provisions infringe right to life, liberty and security of the person — If … Continue reading Morgentaler v Regina: 28 Jan 1988
HM Advocate v Ashrif: 1988
The accused had sought to recover the previous convictions of the complainant not from the prosecution, but from the Scottish Criminal Record Office. Held: The appeal court came down firmly against permitting defence agents to recover the previous convictions of Crown witnesses: ‘In my opinion, there are very sound reasons why a diligence in these … Continue reading HM Advocate v Ashrif: 1988
Murray v United States: 27 Jun 1988
USSC While surveilling petitioner Murray and others suspected of illegal drug activities, federal agents observed both petitioners driving vehicles into, and later out of, a warehouse, and, upon petitioners’ exit, saw that the warehouse contained a tractor-trailer rig bearing a long container.Petitioners later turned over their vehicles to other drivers, who were in turn followed … Continue reading Murray v United States: 27 Jun 1988
Alamieyeseigha, Regina (on the Application Of) v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 25 Nov 2005
The defendant argued that as Governor and Chief Excecutive of Bayelsa State in Nigeria he had sovereign immunity. The Foreign Office had issued a certificate that the defendant was not a Head of States under the 1978 Act. The A-G of Bayelsa had certified that the defendant was a head of State but the A-G … Continue reading Alamieyeseigha, Regina (on the Application Of) v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 25 Nov 2005
The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission and Dr Jim Swire and Rev John F Mosey: HCJ 12 Aug 2015
Application for the review of the conviction of (the now deceased) Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, who was convicted on 31 January 2001 of the murder of 259 passengers and crew on board PanAm flight PA 103 from London to New York, and 11 residents of Lockerbie on 21 December 1988. Lord Justice Clerk, Lord … Continue reading The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission and Dr Jim Swire and Rev John F Mosey: HCJ 12 Aug 2015
Nolkenbockhoff v Germany: ECHR 25 Aug 1987
Hudoc Preliminary objection rejected (victim); No violation of Art. 6-2 10300/83, [1987] ECHR 21, (1991) 13 EHRR 360, (1988) 10 EHRR 163 Worldlii, Bailii Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Hallam, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice SC 30-Jan-2019 These appeals concern the statutory provisions governing the eligibility for compensation … Continue reading Nolkenbockhoff v Germany: ECHR 25 Aug 1987
Hallam, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 30 Jan 2019
These appeals concern the statutory provisions governing the eligibility for compensation of persons convicted of a criminal offence where their conviction is subsequently quashed (or they are pardoned) because of the impact of fresh evidence. It was argued that the failure to make payment amounted to a denial of the right to the presumption of … Continue reading Hallam, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 30 Jan 2019
Adams, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 11 May 2011
The three claimants had each been convicted of murders and served time. Their convictions had been reversed eventually, and they now appealed against the refusal of compensation for imprisonment, saying that there had been a miscarriage of justice. Held: The appeal of Adams was denied, but those of MacDermott and McCartney allowed (by majority). The … Continue reading Adams, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 11 May 2011
Gangar and Another v Serious Fraud Office: Admn 25 Feb 2015
Kenneth Parker J [2015] EWHC 446 (Admin) Bailii Criminal Justice Act 1988 England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543523
Al-Fayed and others v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and others: CA 25 Nov 2004
The appellants appealed from dismissal of their claims for wrongful imprisonment by the respondent. Each had attended at a police station for interview on allegations of theft. They had been arrested and held pending interview and then released. Mr Rowland had left a box in the safe security system under the appellants control. They variously … Continue reading Al-Fayed and others v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and others: CA 25 Nov 2004
Logicrose Ltd v Southend United Football Club Ltd: CA 5 Feb 1988
The agent required the contractual counterparty to pay a bribe of pounds 70,000 to an offshore account. Held: The bribe was held to be recoverable by the principal whether the principal rescinded or affirmed the contract because it was a secret profit. ‘The remedy is not confined to cases where the agent has taken a … Continue reading Logicrose Ltd v Southend United Football Club Ltd: CA 5 Feb 1988
Regina v R (Sentencing: Extended licences): CACD 25 Jul 2003
The imposition of an extended period of licence in respect of offences committed before 1992 did not infringe the defendant’s human rights. The defendant had been convicted of offences from 1976 and 1982. The commencement date for the 1991 Act was 1 October 1992. Held: The true nature of the provision was preventive, to ensure … Continue reading Regina v R (Sentencing: Extended licences): CACD 25 Jul 2003
Faulkner, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another: SC 1 May 2013
The applicants had each been given a life sentence, but having served the minimum term had been due to have the continued detention reviewed to establish whether or not continued detention was necessary for the protection of the pblic. It had not been, and each had claimed there was no basis for his continued detention, … Continue reading Faulkner, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another: SC 1 May 2013
Stack v Dowden: HL 25 Apr 2007
The parties had cohabited for a long time, in a home bought by Ms Dowden. After the breakdown of the relationship, Mr Stack claimed an equal interest in the second family home, which they had bought in joint names. The House was asked whether, when a conveyance into joint names indicates only that each party … Continue reading Stack v Dowden: HL 25 Apr 2007
Regina v Looseley (orse Loosely); Attorney General’s Reference No 3 of 2000: HL 25 Oct 2001
Police Entrapment is no defence to Criminal Act The defendant complained of his conviction for supplying controlled drugs, saying that the undercover police officer had requested him to make the supply. Held: It was an abuse of process for the police to go so far as to incite a crime. Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead said: … Continue reading Regina v Looseley (orse Loosely); Attorney General’s Reference No 3 of 2000: HL 25 Oct 2001
Campbell v Hamlet (as executrix of Simon Alexander): PC 25 Apr 2005
(Trinidad and Tobago) The appellant was an attorney. A complaint was made that he had been given money to buy land, but neither had the land been conveyed nor the money returned. The complaint began in 1988, but final speeches were not heard until . .
Kay, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: Admn 30 Jul 2021
The Claimant challenges the Defendant’s refusal to pay him compensation under section 133 (as amended) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 in the circumstances described below. . .
Director of Public Prosecutions v M (A Minor): Admn 25 May 2004
There was an argument over payment for food with the Turkish chef of a takeaway kebab shop during the course of which the defendant used the words ‘bloody foreigners’ and pushed the shop window causing it to crack. The justices doubted whether the . .
Regina v Matthews: CACD 25 Mar 2003
The defendant appealed his conviction for carrying a bladed article in public, on the basis that the Act transferred to him the onus of establishing the statutory defence.
Held: There were four steps to be applied in assessing the case. Was . .
Seabord Offshore Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport (The Safe Carrier): HL 25 Mar 1994
The House was asked whether a ship manager was legally responsible for the acts of the ship’s chief engineer under s31(1) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988, which imposed a duty on the manager to take all reasonable steps to secure that the ship was . .
Acts
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Daltel Europe Ltd and others v Makki and others: CA 28 Feb 2006
The defendant had breached freezing orders and had verified statements put before the court without honestly believing them. He now challenged the subsequent contempt proceedings saying that they were criminal within section 25 of the 1988 Act and hearsay evidence should not have been allowed. Held: The use of section 25 was confined to the … Continue reading Daltel Europe Ltd and others v Makki and others: CA 28 Feb 2006
Lewis, Regina v: CACD 5 Dec 2013
The appellant was to be tried at the Crown court, facing one either way offence and other summary offences. The indictable offence was withdrawn. He now said that the Crown Court had not had jurisdiction to proceed. Held: Once an indictment was correctly preferred and signed, it remain valid. Judges: McCombe LJ, Griffith Williams J, … Continue reading Lewis, Regina v: CACD 5 Dec 2013
N Ltd and Another, Regina v: CACD 10 Jun 2008
The defence had requested and been give a ruling of no case to answer. The prosecutor now appealed saying that this had been before he had closed the prosecution case, and had been not with his consent. Held: The prosecutor’s appeal succeeded. The Galbraith case did not suggest that the judge had the power he … Continue reading N Ltd and Another, Regina v: CACD 10 Jun 2008
Crown Prosecution Service v Adaka: Admn 6 Jun 2007
Prosecutor’s appeal – whether funds paid into bank accounts represented proceeds of advanced fee frauds. Citations: [2007] EWHC 1304 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Criminal Justice Act 1988 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 06 December 2022; Ref: scu.253665
Crown Prosecution Service v Greenacre: Admn 3 Apr 2007
Following his conviction for false accounting, a confiscation order was made against the defendant. After agreeing various adjournments the prosecutor said that the magistrates court had no power to allow such an adjournment under section 75(2) of the 1980 Act, because section 75(2)(a) of the 1988 Act did not allow magistrates to remit any part … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v Greenacre: Admn 3 Apr 2007
Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and others: HL 28 Oct 1999
Fair Coment on Political Activities The defendant newspaper had published articles wrongly accusing the claimant, the former Prime Minister of Ireland of duplicity. The paper now appealed, saying that it should have had available to it a defence of qualified privilege because of the claimant’s status as a politician. Held: The appeal failed (Lords Hope … Continue reading Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and others: HL 28 Oct 1999
C v S and Others (Money Laundering: Discovery of Documents): CA 3 Oct 1998
The money laundering regulations create a conflict between private rights and criminal provisions, particularly the restriction on information which might prejudice an investigation may be under way. Conflicts were resolved by guidance from NCIS. The court set out a procedure to be followed where compliance with an order for disclosure of information in civil proceedings … Continue reading C v S and Others (Money Laundering: Discovery of Documents): CA 3 Oct 1998
Brosch, Regina v: CACD 7 Apr 2020
Renewed application for leave to appeal against a sentence of imprisonment of 20 months imposed upon the applicant’s plea of guilty to a charge of having an article with a blade or point contrary to s.139(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Citations: [2020] EWCA Crim 601 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing … Continue reading Brosch, Regina v: CACD 7 Apr 2020
Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions; Attorney General’s Reference No 4 of 2002: HL 14 Oct 2004
Appeals were brought complaining as to the apparent reversal of the burden of proof in road traffic cases and in cases under the Terrorism Acts. Was a legal or an evidential burden placed on a defendant? Held: Lord Bingham of Cornhill said: ‘The overriding concern is that a trial should be fair, and the presumption … Continue reading Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions; Attorney General’s Reference No 4 of 2002: HL 14 Oct 2004
Regina v Coutts: HL 19 Jul 2006
The defendant was convicted of murder. Evidence during the trial suggested a possibility of manslaughter, but neither the defence nor prosecution proposed the alternate verdict. The defendant now appealed saying that the judge had an independent duty to leave that option to the jury. Held: The appeal succeeded. The judge should have left a manslaughter … Continue reading Regina v Coutts: HL 19 Jul 2006
Porter, Regina v: CACD 16 Mar 2006
The defendant appealed his conviction of possession of indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children. The images had been deleted, and were irrecoverable, but they had originally been viewed through a program which created a smaller additional image for each original. Though the thumbnail images were no longer accessible without the original, they remained on the … Continue reading Porter, Regina v: CACD 16 Mar 2006
In re X (Restraint Order: Payment out): QBD 22 Apr 2004
A restraint order had been made in respect of the defendant’s assets pending trial. Application was made to release a sum to pay the defendant’s company debts. Held: A payment could be made only where the the realisable value of the property restrained was not reduced. This was not such a case. Judges: David J … Continue reading In re X (Restraint Order: Payment out): QBD 22 Apr 2004
Hanning and Others v Top Deck Travel Group Ltd: CA 9 Jun 1993
The owner of a common appealed a finding that the neighbouring land owner had acquired by prescription a right of way across the common to use a track for commercial vehicles (buses) to get to the property (the bus depot). Held: An easement cannot become a right where the use of the route is illegal … Continue reading Hanning and Others v Top Deck Travel Group Ltd: CA 9 Jun 1993
Times Newspapers Ltd and others v Soldier B: CACD 24 Oct 2008
(Court’s Martial Appeal Court) The newspaper appealed against an order under section 94 of the 1955 Act restricting the identification of the defendants. The judge had said there would be a threat to both the safety of the defendants and as to the administration of justice and national security. It was now accepted that the … Continue reading Times Newspapers Ltd and others v Soldier B: CACD 24 Oct 2008
Regina v Hargreaves: CACD 30 Jul 1999
A cyclist stopped by the police had a knife in an inside pocket. He claimed to have taken it from home and then forgotten about it. He was advised that for the purposes of the section neither forgetfulness nor the fact that he was transporting the knife from one private property to another could amount … Continue reading Regina v Hargreaves: CACD 30 Jul 1999
Regina v Thomas, Regina v Flannagan: CACD 24 Jul 1998
Section allowing admission of documentary evidence was not a breach of requirements of European Convention on Human Rights. Reading of statements allowed where witness in fear. Judge given sufficient balancing discretion to follow convention Citations: Times 24-Jul-1998 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1988 23 24 825 26 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Human Rights Updated: 25 October … Continue reading Regina v Thomas, Regina v Flannagan: CACD 24 Jul 1998
Regina v W: CACD 16 Mar 1993
The court of appeal had no jurisdiction to hear an application by the Attorney General to review what he considered an unduly lenient sentence on a youth of sixteen convicted of rape. The offence is for the purposes of the Act only triable at the Crown Court, and is not subject to review. Citations: Times … Continue reading Regina v W: CACD 16 Mar 1993
Regina v McAndrew-Bingham: CACD 28 Dec 1998
The offence of attempted child-abduction is an offence of assault or threat of injury, and so the evidence in chief of the child complainant could be given by video recording, and any cross examination be done by live television link. Citations: Gazette 03-Feb-1999, Times 28-Dec-1998 Statutes: Child Abduction Act 1984 2, Criminal Justice Act 1988 … Continue reading Regina v McAndrew-Bingham: CACD 28 Dec 1998
Regina v Mattey, Regina v Queeley: CACD 13 Oct 1994
The admission of written evidence for the defendant under the section was to be decided on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. Citations: Ind Summary 24-Oct-1994, Times 13-Oct-1994, Gazette 09-Nov-1994 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1988 23 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Evidence Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.87296
Regina v Jiminez-Paez: CACD 16 Mar 1993
A consular official with immunity is not deemed to be outside UK for witness summons. Citations: Times 16-Mar-1993, Ind Summary 22-Mar-1993 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1988 23(2)(b)(i) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.86997
Regina v Allen (Brian Roger): CACD 13 Oct 1999
The legislation encompassed the failure to pay tax as a benefit accrued through criminal activity, and therefore a court could order forfeiture of the proceeds of the crime, even though the wrong-doer might remain liable for the unpaid taxes in civil law. The possibility of such double liability was not relevant to the criminal proceedings. … Continue reading Regina v Allen (Brian Roger): CACD 13 Oct 1999
Regina v McLoughlin; Regina v Newell: CACD 18 Feb 2014
In each case the appellant had been convicted of particularly serious murders and had been given whole life terms. They now appealed saying that such sentences were incompatible with their human rights after the ruling of the ECHR Grand Chamber in Vinter v UK. Held: The appeals failed. Judges: Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, LCJ; Sir … Continue reading Regina v McLoughlin; Regina v Newell: CACD 18 Feb 2014
Patel v Mirza: SC 20 Jul 2016
The claimant advanced funds to the respondent for him to invest in a bank of which the claimant had insider knowledge. In fact the defendant did not invest the funds, the knowledge was incorrect. The defendant however did not return the sums advanced, saying he need not return it because the contract was for an … Continue reading Patel v Mirza: SC 20 Jul 2016
Regina v Ali: CACD 14 Nov 2003
The defendant appealed conviction and sentence for sexual assaults on young girls. He complained that the prosecution had been allowed to bring in evidence of previous consistent statements. Held: The evidence of the mother had been admitted in a manner agreed between the defence and prosecutor, and the defence had not gone outside the agreement. … Continue reading Regina v Ali: CACD 14 Nov 2003
Loughlin, Re Application for Judicial Review: SC 18 Oct 2017
The court was asked as to the circumstances in which sentences passed on offenders who have given assistance to prosecuting authorities should be referred back to the sentencing court under section 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. Held: ‘The Divisional Court’s view that the predominant factor in deciding where the interests … Continue reading Loughlin, Re Application for Judicial Review: SC 18 Oct 2017
Regina on the Application of Uttley v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 30 Jul 2003
Licence conditions imposed at the time of sentence would restrict the defendant after he had served his sentence and been released, and so operated as a heavier penalty, and section 33(1) was incompatible with the defendant’s Art 7.1 rights. Held: Before the 1991 Act, a prisoner was entitled to release after serving the necessary part … Continue reading Regina on the Application of Uttley v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 30 Jul 2003
Regina v Bartle and The Commissioner Of Police For The Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet Ugarte, Regina v Evans and Another and The Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis and Others (No 1): HL 22 Nov 1998
The government of Spain had issued an arrest warrant and application for extradition in respect of Pinochet Ugarte for his alleged crimes whilst president of Chile. He was arrested in England. He pleaded that he had immunity from prosecution. Held: A head of state’s immunity from prosecution extends only to official acts performed in exercise … Continue reading Regina v Bartle and The Commissioner Of Police For The Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet Ugarte, Regina v Evans and Another and The Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis and Others (No 1): HL 22 Nov 1998
Regina v Field (Brian John); Regina v Young (Alfred): CACD 12 Dec 2002
Each applicant having been convicted of indecent assaults involving children, now appealed an order banning them from working with children. Held: The orders were not penalties within article 7. The order was available in the absence of a conviction, and it was intended as a preventive measure rather than a punitive one. The section could … Continue reading Regina v Field (Brian John); Regina v Young (Alfred): CACD 12 Dec 2002
Bohannan, Regina v: CACD 21 Sep 2010
The court granted to the prosecutor leave to appeal as unduly lenient against the sentence of three years imprisonment imposed on the defendant for misconduct in public office. As a police offiocer with access to police information systems he had supplied sensitive and confidential information to criminal associates in return for cocaine.. Judges: Leveson LJ, … Continue reading Bohannan, Regina v: CACD 21 Sep 2010
Sea Shepherd UK v Fish and Fish Ltd: SC 4 Mar 2015
Accessory Liability in Tort The court considered the concept of accessory liability in tort. Activists had caused damage to vessels of the respondent which was transporting live tuna in cages, and had caused considerable damage. The appellant company owned the ship from which the attacks were made, but denied direct involvement in or responsibility for … Continue reading Sea Shepherd UK v Fish and Fish Ltd: SC 4 Mar 2015
Kennedy v The Charity Commission: SC 26 Mar 2014
The claimant journalist sought disclosure of papers acquired by the respondent in its conduct of enquiries into the charitable Mariam appeal. The Commission referred to an absolute exemption under section 32(2) of the 2000 Act, saying that the exemption continued until the papers were destroyed, or for 20 years under the 1958 Act. Held: The … Continue reading Kennedy v The Charity Commission: SC 26 Mar 2014
A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2): HL 8 Dec 2005
Evidence from 3rd Party Torture Inadmissible The applicants had been detained following the issue of certificates issued by the respondent that they posed a terrorist threat. They challenged the decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission saying that evidence underlying the decisions had probably been obtained by torture committed by foreign powers, and should not … Continue reading A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2): HL 8 Dec 2005
A v British Broadcasting Corporation (Scotland): SC 8 May 2014
Anonymised Party to Proceedings The BBC challenged an order made by the Court of Session in judicial review proceedings, permitting the applicant review to delete his name and address and substituting letters of the alphabet, in the exercise (or, as the BBC argues, purported exercise) of a common law power. The court also gave directions … Continue reading A v British Broadcasting Corporation (Scotland): SC 8 May 2014
Miller, Regina (on the Application of) v The Prime Minister; Cherry QC v Lord Advocate: SC 24 Sep 2019
Prerogative act of prorogation was justiciable. The Prime Minister had prorogued Parliament for a period of five weeks, leaving only a short time for Parliament to debate and act the forthcoming termination of the membership by the UK of the EU. The Scottish Court had decided (Cherry) that the prorogation was void being for impermissible … Continue reading Miller, Regina (on the Application of) v The Prime Minister; Cherry QC v Lord Advocate: SC 24 Sep 2019
In Re A (Minors) (Conjoined Twins: Medical Treatment); aka In re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation): CA 22 Sep 2000
Twins were conjoined (Siamese). Medically, both could not survive, and one was dependent upon the vital organs of the other. Doctors applied for permission to separate the twins which would be followed by the inevitable death of one of them. The parents, devout Roman Catholics, resisted. Held: The parents’ views were subject to the overriding … Continue reading In Re A (Minors) (Conjoined Twins: Medical Treatment); aka In re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation): CA 22 Sep 2000
Regina v Perrin: CACD 22 Mar 2002
The defendant had been convicted of publishing obscene articles for gain under the Act. He lived in London, and published a web site which was stored or hosted abroad, containing pornographic items. The investigating officer had called up the web-site from within the UK. The defendant appealed saying that he had not acted within the … Continue reading Regina v Perrin: CACD 22 Mar 2002
Saik, Regina v: HL 3 May 2006
The defendant appealed aganst his conviction for conspiracy to engage in moneylaundering. At trial he pleaded guilty subject to a qualification that he had not known that the money was the proceeds of crime, though he may have suspected that it would be. Held: (Baroness Hale of Richmond dissenting) The appeal succeeded: ‘the Crown’s principal … Continue reading Saik, Regina v: HL 3 May 2006
Enfield London Borough Council v Argos Ltd: Admn 24 Jun 2008
The defendant company had been accused of selling a bladed article to a youth making a test purchase. The prosecutor now appealed by way of case stated raising the question as to whether a reasonable precaution taken after a test case conducted by the trading standards of a local authority necessarily discloses a failure to … Continue reading Enfield London Borough Council v Argos Ltd: Admn 24 Jun 2008
Clancy, Regina v: CACD 18 Jan 2012
The defendant appealed against two convictions under the 1988 Act for possession of a bladed article in a public place. She said that whilst riding in a taxi, she had been sexually assaulted. She later collected the knives and went off to find the taxi driver. She had been drinking. She complained of the judge’s … Continue reading Clancy, Regina v: CACD 18 Jan 2012
Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: SC 23 Mar 2011
The claimants had been detained under the 1971 Act, after completing sentences of imprisonment pending their return to their home countries under deportations recommended by the judges at trial, or chosen by the respondent. They challenged as unlawful the respondent’s, at first unpublished, policy introduced in 2006, that by default, those awaiting deportation should be … Continue reading Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: SC 23 Mar 2011
Revenue and Customs Prosecution Service v Kearney: Admn 27 Feb 2007
The Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office appealed by way of case stated from a decision of the Crown Court to extend by four months the time limit available to pay a confiscation order made under section 71 of the 1988 Act. The question was whether the Crown Court had jurisdiction to vary or extend the … Continue reading Revenue and Customs Prosecution Service v Kearney: Admn 27 Feb 2007
Gillan v The Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 15 Feb 2007
Before committing the defendant for sentence, the magistrates court had itself decided on disputed facts behind the plea. After being committed to the Crown Court, the defendant asked that court to conduct a further hearing to determine the facts. He now appealed a decision that that court did not have the jurisdiction to do so. … Continue reading Gillan v The Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 15 Feb 2007
Raissi, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 22 Feb 2007
The claimant sought judicial review of a refusal to make an ex gratia payment for his imprisonment whilst successfully resisting extradition proceedings. Terrorist connections had been suggested, but the judge made an explicit finding that at no stage had any evidence been produced. Held: The 1988 Act provided only limited circumstances for a payment, but … Continue reading Raissi, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 22 Feb 2007
McManus, Regina v: CANI 19 Oct 2006
A-G’s appeal against sentence of 15 months Custody Probation following the defendant’s conviction for causing death by careless driving having consumed excess alcohol. Judges: Nicholson LJ. Campbell LJ and Coghlin J Citations: [2006] NICA 39 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1988, Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 1995 14(1)(b) Northern Ireland, Criminal Sentencing Updated: 08 … Continue reading McManus, Regina v: CANI 19 Oct 2006
O’Donnell, Regina v: CANI 19 Oct 2006
The Attorney General sought to appeal against the defendant’s sentence for blackmail, saying that it ( Custody Probation Order of 6 years, consisting of 4 and a half years’ imprisonment followed by 18 months on probation) was unduly lenient. Judges: Nicholson LJ, Campbell LJ and Coghlin J Citations: [2006] NICA 38 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal … Continue reading O’Donnell, Regina v: CANI 19 Oct 2006
Suchedina v Regina; similar: CACD 27 Oct 2006
Four defendants appealed convictions in money laundering cases. The first defendant operated a money exchange through which substantial volumes of cash were moved, but claimed that he believed the money to have been honestly acquired. Held: Saik now meant that the requirement was for actual suspicion, not mere reasonable cause for suspicion. However in this … Continue reading Suchedina v Regina; similar: CACD 27 Oct 2006
McKenna v Her Majesty’s Advocate: ScHC 30 Dec 1999
The appellant was charged with murder. A witness had since died, and he objected to the introduction of his written statement, on the basis that this would infringe his right to a fair trial. The evidence was likely to be decisive. Held: The fairness of the trial had to be considered as a whole. There … Continue reading McKenna v Her Majesty’s Advocate: ScHC 30 Dec 1999
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, Mahmoud Abu Rideh Jamal Ajouaou v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 11 Aug 2004
The claimants had each been detained without trial for more than two years, being held as suspected terrorists. They were free leave to return to their own countries, but they feared for their lives if returned. They complained that the evidence used to justify their detention was derived from practices involving torture by the US … Continue reading A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, Mahmoud Abu Rideh Jamal Ajouaou v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 11 Aug 2004
Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 4 Apr 2006
The claimant had dual Irish and US nationality. He therefore also was a citizen of the EU. He complained that the British rules against payment of job seekers’ allowance were discriminatory. The matter had already been to the ECJ. Held: The residence test as applied was not in contravention of EU law. ‘[T]he proper interpretation … Continue reading Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 4 Apr 2006
Capewell v Customs and Excise and Another (No 2): CA 29 Jul 2005
The Commissioners had been appointed as receiver of the claimant’s assets. The receivership was later discharged, but should have been discharged earlier, the court had the power not only to calculate the level of remuneration but also who should be responsible for making payment. In this case the commissioner should bear some of the cost. … Continue reading Capewell v Customs and Excise and Another (No 2): CA 29 Jul 2005
J v Crown Prosecution Service: CA 24 Jun 2005
The defendant had been made subject to a criminal restraint order so as to preserve his assets pending the outcome of criminal proceedings. He complained that the order affected property which was not his. Held: Such an order could cover property which he had obtained for the benefit of somebody else. What was required was … Continue reading J v Crown Prosecution Service: CA 24 Jun 2005
Attorney General’s Reference Nos 5-8 of 2003 (Davies, Rowan, Abbey, Hassan): CACD 14 Nov 2003
The Attorney-General referred sentences for conspiracy to supply drugs. The offenders were part of a highly professional organisation, in close contact with each other and others in this country and abroad over a period of months, which culminated in the importation of Class A and B drugs worth in the region of andpound;5 million, intended … Continue reading Attorney General’s Reference Nos 5-8 of 2003 (Davies, Rowan, Abbey, Hassan): CACD 14 Nov 2003
Sellick and Sellick, Regina v: CACD 14 Mar 2005
The defendants appealed convictions for murder saying that the court had had read to it the statements of four witnesses who refused to attend for fear, having been intimidated. Other witnesses had been unco-operative and had been treated by the prosecution as hostile. Held: The appeal failed. The appellants’ rights under Article 6 were in … Continue reading Sellick and Sellick, Regina v: CACD 14 Mar 2005
Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 22 Nov 2004
The claimant had obtained judgment against customers of the defendant, and then freezing orders for the accounts. The defendants inadvertently or negligently allowed sums to be transferred from the accounts. The claimants sought repayment by the bank. Held: The bank was liable. ‘a duty ought to be imposed on the Bank, towards claimants who have … Continue reading Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 22 Nov 2004
Buckley, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 22 Oct 2004
Appeal against conviction for common assault. The defendant argued his actions had been in defence of his girlfriend who had been surrounded in the street by an aggressive group of drunken young women. The magistrates had found his reaction to be more than reasonable. Held: The magistrates having properly directed themselves according to Palmer, and … Continue reading Buckley, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 22 Oct 2004
Ahmed and Qureshi v Regina: CACD 28 Oct 2004
The defendants appealed confiscation orders saying that the court had taken account of their interests in the matrimonial home, and that this would prejudice the interest of others. Held: Before the amendment to the section, the court had retained a discretion as to whther or not to include the value of a matrimonial home in … Continue reading Ahmed and Qureshi v Regina: CACD 28 Oct 2004
Regina v Laming: CACD 1989
The defendant appealed saying that the court clerk had signed the indictment in the wrong place. Held: The signature had been intended to validate the indictment. The appeal failed. Citations: (1989) 90 Cr App R 450 Statutes: Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933 1 2, Indictment (Rules) 1971 (1971 No 1253) 4(1) Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Regina v Laming: CACD 1989
Independent Assessor v O’Brien, Hickey, Hickey: CA 29 Jul 2004
The claimants had been imprisoned for many years before their convictions were quashed. They claimed compensation under the Act. The assessor said that there should be deducted from the award the living expenses they would have incurred if they had not been in prison. Held: The statutory scheme replaced an ex gratia scheme, and there … Continue reading Independent Assessor v O’Brien, Hickey, Hickey: CA 29 Jul 2004
Lobban, Regina v: CACD 7 May 2004
The defendant appealed his conviction. A witness statement had been read, but he had wanted to cross examine her. The court was satisfied that her refusal to give evidence in person was through fear. Held: In making the decision, the judge had incorrectly said that her evidence was uncontested. The errors began with discussions in … Continue reading Lobban, Regina v: CACD 7 May 2004
Coughlan, Regina v: CACD 2 Mar 1999
Appeal after statement of witness read to the court Citations: [1999] EWCA Crim 553 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1988 23 24 25 26 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.536015
Regina v Deprince: CACD 9 Mar 2004
The defendant appealed against a confiscation order made under the drug trafficking legislation. The judge had made a finding that there would be a serious chance of unfairness in the order but had continued nonetheless, by reducing the relative proportion ordered. Held: It could not be the law that if the judge found a serious … Continue reading Regina v Deprince: CACD 9 Mar 2004
Regina v Gulbir Rana Singh: CACD 18 Dec 2003
The defendant appealed conviction on three counts of conspiracy to launder money. The prosecution said that he and his co-accused engaged in money laundering between June 1999 and March 2000. Each count alleged that he and his co-conspirators engaged in transactions which were prohibited by section 49(2)(b) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 and section … Continue reading Regina v Gulbir Rana Singh: CACD 18 Dec 2003
Kelleher, Regina v: CACD 20 Nov 2003
The defendant, out of strong conviction, entered an art gallery and knocked the head from a statue of Margaret Thatcher. Held: The court examined the breadth of the defence of ‘lawful excuse’ to a charge of criminal damage, and whether a court could direct a jury to convict. Despite the possible defects in the direction, … Continue reading Kelleher, Regina v: CACD 20 Nov 2003
Goldstein, Rimmington v Regina: CACD 28 Nov 2003
Two defendants appealed in respect of alleged offences under common law of causing a public nuisance. One had sent race hatred material, and the other bomb hoaxes, through the post. Both claimed that the offence was so ill defined as to be an infringement of their rights. Held: The offence of causing a public nuisance … Continue reading Goldstein, Rimmington v Regina: CACD 28 Nov 2003
Jolie v Regina: CACD 23 May 2003
The appellant had been convicted of having a pointed article with him in a public place. He said that the car he was driving had needed an instrument to operate the lock. At first he had used a knife, but then used scissors, losing the knife in the car. Held: The jury must be required … Continue reading Jolie v Regina: CACD 23 May 2003
Jarrett v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police: CA 14 Feb 2003
The claimant sought damages for false imprisonment and assault after her wrongful arrest. She had waived her handbag at an officer investigating a disturbance and been arrested. The police said the arrest was lawful, she being suspected of common assault. Held: The judge was entitled to take the view that, taking the evidence at its … Continue reading Jarrett v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police: CA 14 Feb 2003
Hewison v Meridian Shipping Pte, Coflexip Stena Offshore Ltd, Flex Installer Offshore Ltd: CA 11 Dec 2002
The claimant was awarded damages for injuries suffered in his work as a seaman. The respondents claimed that he should not receive damages, since he had made false declarations as to his health in order to obtain employment, hiding his epilepsy condition. Held: Clunis established that the court would not support an action founded upon … Continue reading Hewison v Meridian Shipping Pte, Coflexip Stena Offshore Ltd, Flex Installer Offshore Ltd: CA 11 Dec 2002
