Europa The limit-date of 1 August for fixing the intervention price and derived intervention prices in Article 3(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1785/81 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector is not strict. Therefore, failure to observe that date cannot have the effect of rendering invalid Regulations No 1580/96 and … Continue reading Italy v Council C-340/98: ECJ 14 Mar 2002
ECJ (Judgment) Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1785/81 and 2225/86 – Aid for the marketing of cane sugar produced in the French overseas departments – Concept of refinery Citations: C-269/96, [1998] EUECJ C-269/96 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: European Agriculture Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.161928
ECJ Common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector – Reallocation or transfer of quotas – Interpretation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1785/81, (EEC) No 193/82 and (EC) No 1260/2001 – Decision of competent authorities of a Member State, when approving a merger, to reallocate sugar production quotas – Sale by public auction – … Continue reading Sociedad Cooperativa General Agropecuaria (ACOR) v Administracion General del Estado: ECJ 20 Nov 2003
ECJ Agriculture – Common organization of the markets – Sugar – Production quotas – Relationship between sugar manufacturers and beet growers – Offers from the manufacturer to purchase quantities of beet intended for the manufacture of sugar within the limits of the A and B quotas – Detailed rules for the allocation of the quantities … Continue reading Morlins v Zuckerfabrik Konigslutter-Twulpstedt (Rec 1993,p I-6017) (Judgment): ECJ 17 Nov 1993
ECJ Member States may not, for the marketing year starting on 1 July, exercise the power to adjust the quotas of undertakings, conferred on them by Article 25(2) of Regulation No 1785/81 on the common organization of the markets in the sugar sector, after the date of 1 March set by Regulation No 193/82 laying … Continue reading Cavarzere Produzioni Industriali and others v Ministero dell’Agricoltura e delle Foreste and others: ECJ 11 Aug 1995
The claimant had sought repayment of overpaid VAT, and the respondent resisted arguing that this would be an unjust enrichment. A reference to the European Court was sought.
Held: It was not possible to say that the House’s opinion was acte . .