A traditional gypsy family had settled because of ill health, and sought to establish a caravan site. The authority claimed they were no longer to be treated as Gypsy and having the entitlement under the Act. Held: The Act defined ‘Gypsies’ as persons of nomadic habit. It was a question of fact for each planning … Continue reading Wrexham County Borough v The National Assembly of Wales, Michael Berry, Florence Berry: CA 19 Jun 2003
A person could be a gypsy for the purpose of section 16 of the 1968 Act if he led a nomadic way of life only seasonally. Judges: Lord Bridge of Harwich Citations: [1989] 1 AC 995 Statutes: Caravan Sites Act 1968 16 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Wrexham County Borough v The … Continue reading Greenwich London Borough Council v Powell: HL 1989
The applicants sought to argue that the attempt to evict him from the caravan site he occupied infringed his article 8 and 14 rights. Though the Isaacs case had decided there was good reason to deny security, he argued that was no longer applicable, since many gypsies did not now seek a roving life. Held: … Continue reading Regina (on the application of Smith) v Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council and another: Admn 19 Nov 2002
The police have power to release limited information about offenders. In this case known paedophiles were staying at a campsite, and their criminal record was disclosed to the site owner. There was no harrassment under s3 of the 1968 Act. On any duty of confidence: ‘I have great difficulty in accepting that the information which … Continue reading Regina v Chief Constable for North Wales Police Area Authority ex parte AB and CD etc: Admn 10 Jul 1997
The meaning of ‘Gypsy’ under the Act requires some element of travelling, and should include that this was associated with the means of earning a living. In applying the statutory definition of gypsies the actual words used are to be used, taking account of the purpose of the Act and the duty imposed The are … Continue reading Regina v South Hams District Council, ex parte Gibb and Another, Regina v Gloucester Cc, ex parte Davies: CA 8 Jun 1994
A local Authority must make proper welfare enquiries before seeking to remove unlawful campers. The new draconic legislation must be seen in its context. The commons of England provided lawful stopping places for people whose way of life was or had become nomadic. Enough common land survived enclosure to make this way of life still … Continue reading Regina v Lincolnshire County Council Ex Parte Atkinson; Regina v Wealden District Council Ex Parte Wales and Others: QBD 3 Oct 1995
The definition of ‘gypsy’ covers persons who travel to make a living. Citations: Times 01-Feb-1994 Statutes: Caravan Sites Act 1968 16 Housing Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.86562
The claimant sought a injunction to restrain the defendant council from executing enforcement notices regarding the use of the claimant’s land for residence by several traveller families. He argued that the council had failed to state its exact intentions on enforcement, and that it was feared that it would exceed the steps necessary for enforcement. … Continue reading Egan v Basildon Borough Council: QBD 26 Sep 2011
The term ‘Gypsy’ is to be interpreted to include persons who have a nomadic life but more than just habit. . .
The council appealed against the inspector’s decision to quash its enforcement notice. The land-owner occupied a wooden structure which he said was a caravan, but the council said was a residence and an unlawful change of use of agricultural land. . .
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
The caravan park operated under planning consents requiring the caravans to be occupied only during certain months. The defendants had bought their mobile homes from the claimants to occupy full time, and said that the claimants knew of this. The claimants purported to impose new leases with clauses requiring the site not to be occupied … Continue reading Brightlingsea Haven Ltd and Another v Morris and others: QBD 30 Oct 2008
The House was asked ‘whether a local authority can obtain a summary order for possession against an occupier of a site which it owns and has been used for many years as a gipsy and travellers’ caravan site. His licence to occupy the site has come to an end. He has no enforceable right to … Continue reading Doherty and others v Birmingham City Council: HL 30 Jul 2008
