Vansandau and Brown v Browne: 24 Nov 1832

An attorney is not compelled to proceed to the end of a suit in order to be entitled to his costs, but may, upon reasonable cause and reasonable notice, abandon the conduct of the suit, and in such case may recover his costs for the period during which he was employed.

Citations:

[1832] EngR 869, (1832) 9 Bing 403, (1832) 131 ER 667

Links:

Commonlii

Cited by:

CitedUnderwood, Son and Piper v Lewis CA 11-May-1894
Solicitors had declined to continue to act for their client before the litigation in which they were acting had been completed. They brought an action for the amount of their bill of costs for work done to date. The trial judge held that a solicitor . .
CitedRichard Buxton (Solicitors) v Mills-Owens and Another CA 23-Feb-2010
The solicitors felt that the instructions received from their client were to pursue points which neither they nor counsel thought were properly arguable. They withdrew from the case, and now appealed against a refusal of their costs on the basis . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Legal Professions

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.319816