EAT Practice and Procedure: Appellate Jurisdiction/Reasons/Burns-Barke – The Appellant complained that the Employment Tribunal had failed to identify, refer to or evaluate the evidence in relation to a particular finding of fact. It was accepted that there was evidence to support the finding and that it was not perverse. In the circumstances of the case, neither Meek nor Rule 62(4) required the evidence to be referred to and evaluated.
In any event, in fact the Employment Tribunal had explained the basis of the finding in the course of the Reasons, albeit in a somewhat obscure way.
[2015] UKEAT 0138 – 15 – 1108
Bailii
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 04 January 2022; Ref: scu.552839