Ancillary relief.
Held: The circumstances, in particular the bringing of very substantial assets to the marriage by the husband were sufficient to justify an award departing from equality in his favour (60%/40%).
Judges:
Burton J
Citations:
[2006] EWHC 2793 (Fam), [2007] 1 FLR 1496, [2007] Fam Law 106
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – S v AG (Financial Remedy: Lottery Prize) FD 14-Oct-2011
The court considered how to treat a lottery win of andpound;500,000 in the context of an ancillary relief application on a divorce.
Held: The answers in such cases must be fact specific. ‘In the application of the sharing principle (as opposed . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Family
Updated: 11 July 2022; Ref: scu.258180