HCA International Ltd v May-Bheemul: EAT 23 Mar 2011

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs
An appeal by the Respondent employers against the Tribunal’s decision that no order for costs should be made against the Claimant, her claims of detriment on the ground of protected disclosures and constructive unfair dismissal having all been dismissed after a hearing lasting some 12 days.
No error of law was disclosed in the Tribunal’s reasoning and the perversity challenge failed. Appeal dismissed.

Citations:

[2011] UKEAT 0477 – 10 – 2303

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 08 September 2022; Ref: scu.434903