The claimant, the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust sought to quash as flawed and unlawful a consultation by the first defendant concerning the reconfiguration of paediatric congenital cardiac services (PCCS) in England.
Judges:
Owen J
Citations:
[2011] EWHC 2986 (Admin)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust v Joint Committee of Primary Care Trusts and Others (Costs) Admn 15-Dec-2011
. .
Appeal from – Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Regina (on The Application of) v Joint Committee of Primary Care Trusts and Another CA 19-Apr-2012
The defendant appealed against a finding that its consultation over the rationalisation of pediatric cardiac surgical facilities had been defective and unlawful. . .
Cited – Moseley, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Haringey SC 29-Oct-2014
Consultation requirements
The claimant challenged a decision of the respondent reducing the benefits under the Council Tax Reduction Scheme reducing Council Tax for those in need, saying that the Council’s consultation had been inadequate.
Held: The consultation was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Health, Administrative
Updated: 26 September 2022; Ref: scu.448117