EAT Practice and Procedure : Imposition of Deposit – The Employment Judge failed to address rule 20(2) and 20(3) of the 2004 ET Rules as she failed (a) not to refer to the material she considered (b) how she engaged with key material and (c) how she arrived on the figures for deposit orders, Simpson v (1) Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police (2) Scottish Police Services Authority UKEATS/0030/11/BI, 10/1/12 considered.
Birtles J
[2013] UKEAT 0211 – 13 – 1812
Bailii
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 01 December 2021; Ref: scu.522362
