Dora v Semper: CA 15 Mar 1999

The claimant sought to have admitted evidence that in the course of without prejudice negotiations, the defendant had threatened to put assets beyond the jurisdiction.
Held: The statement was not an admission as such and was admissible.

Citations:

15 March 1999 (unreported)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

DistinguishedBerry Trade Ltd and Another v Moussavi and others CA 22-May-2003
A defendant appealed against an order admitting as evidence, records of ‘without prejudice’ conversations.
Held: Written and oral communications, which are made for the purpose of a genuine attempt to compromise a dispute between the parties, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Evidence

Updated: 12 May 2022; Ref: scu.182477