Freeman had recovered in debt against Waterer, and had a fieri fac. and the sheriff takes the goods, and returns, that he could not have buyers, andc. and that yet F. knowing that, hath sued another fieri fac. and F. upon that brought an action upon the case, and the better opinion was that it was well, although that F. had sued it in course. The 2 R. 3. 9. was urged to the contrary. But note, there it does not appear whether the suit was determined or not, and res adhuc sub. judice. ve. 5 E. 4. 126. 4. rep. 18. and in the Kings Bench, M. 43. 44 Eliz
Citations:
[1669] EngR 575, (1669) Noy 23, (1669) 74 ER 994 (B)
Links:
Citing:
See Also – Waterer v Freeman 1792
Waterer brought an action of the case against Freeman, and declared, that the defendant had sued out at Westminster. a fieri fac. upon a judgment given against him for the deferidant, for a trespass in Oxfordshire, in the King’s Bench to the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Torts – Other
Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.407415
