Regina v Secretary of State for Employment, Ex Parte Seymour-Smith and Another: CA 3 Aug 1995

The rule which extended to two years, the time before the vesting of employment rights was discriminatory, since it affected more women than men.

Gazette 08-Aug-1995, Times 03-Aug-1995
Unfair Dismissal (Variation of Qualifying period) Order 1985 (1985 No 782)
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal fromRegina v Secretary of State for Employment, Ex Parte Seymour-Smith and Another QBD 1995
(Divisional and Court of appeal) The claimants sought judicial review of a condition requiring an employee to have had two years of continuous employment before becoming eligible to make a claim for unfair dismissal. This condition was neutrally . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromRegina v Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte Seymour Smith (1) HL 13-Mar-1997
The House referred to the European Court the question of whether the extension of the minimum period of employment before employment rights were acquired, was discriminatory. . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Discrimination

Updated: 10 December 2021; Ref: scu.87716