References: [1976] 1 EGLR 215, [1976] 238 EG 421
Links:
Coram: W H Rees FRICS
Ratio: The Tribunal considered, for the first time the effect of a marriage value in determining the price of the freehold reversion.
Held: The marriage value was to be divided equally between the freeholder and tenant applicant.
Statutes: Housing Act 1974 118, Leasehold Reform Act 1967
This case cites:
- Cited – Official Custodian for Charities v Goldridge CA ((1973) 26 P & CR 191, (1973) 227 EG 1467)
The social policy underlying the 1967 Act is that ‘the land belongs in equity to the landowner and the house belongs in equity to the occupying leaseholder.’ . .
(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:
- Applied – Lloyd-Jones v Church Commissioners for England ([1982] 1 EGLR 209)
The tenant’s lease had about twelve years unexpired and was at a rent of £45 per annum. The valuation of the landlord’s reversionary freehold interest involved two stages. The first stage was to assess the so-called investment value of the . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 29-Aug-16
Ref: 278770
