Search Results for: National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992

Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Yorkshire Regional Health Authority Ex Parte Suri, Regina v Same Ex Parte Gompels Etc: CA 5 Dec 1995

Effect of move of pharmacy is one of fact and degree for Health Authority to decide. Move of pharmacy question of geography not topography – effect on other pharmacies. Citations: Times 05-Dec-1995, Ind Summary 18-Dec-1995 Statutes: National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – Regina v Yorkshire Health … Continue reading Regina v Yorkshire Regional Health Authority Ex Parte Suri, Regina v Same Ex Parte Gompels Etc: CA 5 Dec 1995

Doctor Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 20 Dec 2002

The appellants were doctors practicing far from a pharmacy. They themselves administered rather than dispensed drugs direct to their clients under the regulation. They appealed a finding that the supplies were exempt supplies, asserting instead that they were zero-rated. The NHS refused to make an allowance against VAT paid on drugs supplied to regulation 20 … Continue reading Doctor Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 20 Dec 2002

Regina v Yorkshire Health Authourity ex parte Suri; Regina v Same ex parte Gompels (D and M): QBD 18 Jul 1994

Pharmacists list membership was dependant on the effect on the entire population, and not the patient population. A relocation within same neighbourhood was a question of fact not by ‘patient populations’. Citations: Times 15-Aug-1994, Ind Summary 18-Jul-1994 Statutes: National Health Serv (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Regina … Continue reading Regina v Yorkshire Health Authourity ex parte Suri; Regina v Same ex parte Gompels (D and M): QBD 18 Jul 1994