The decision of the Court of Appeal in Jenkins v. Livesey (formerly Jenkins) … is a reminder that in all cases where application is made for a financial provision or property adjustment order the court is required to have before it an agreed statement of the general nature of the means of each party signed … Continue reading Practice Direction (Family Division: Financial Statement): 1984

Where husband and wife were partners in a business, the court deciding ancillary relief should first assess what each would get on a dissolution, then ask if family court powers to be exercised to increase the wife’s share, if not then should it be reduced. Judges: Butler-Sloss, Thorpe, Mantell LJJ Citations: Times 13-Jul-1998, [1998] EWCA … Continue reading White v White: CA 19 Jun 1998

Judges: Sir Mark Potter P Citations: [2008] EWHC 112 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 742, [2008] 2 FCR 682 Links: Bailii Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 31(7) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Family Updated: 13 October 2022; Ref: scu.264012

The wife said that she had not got a good bargain in an agreement settling ancillary relief applications. Held: The court must have regard to s.25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, but also to: ‘Conduct of the parties in all the circumstances . . (which) must include the fact of and the nature of an … Continue reading Dean v Dean: FD 1978

It was argued that in order for the court fully to flex its powers at final hearing under section 23 and section 24 MCA 1973, it was necessary to issue a separate application under the MWPA 1882 (or the Law of Property Act 1925). Citations: [1980] 1 WLR 4 Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 23 … Continue reading Ward v Ward and Greene: 1980

Consent orders had been made for maintenance and financial provision. The House was now asked whether the former wife could seek a property adjustment order of a type that had been sought in her petition but had not been made by the consent orders. Held: The House accepted, that: ‘subject to the provisions of that … Continue reading Dinch v Dinch: HL 1987

An order had been made in 1981 for the home not to be sold until the youngest child had attained the age of 17 ‘or further order’. The wife, who was living in the home with the children, against a judge’s determination that he had no jurisdiction to entertain her subsequent application for an order … Continue reading Thompson v Thompson: CA 1986

In an ancillary relief application, there was enough capital to provide adequately for both husband and wife. Held: When considering the needs and obligations of the parties a broad view could be taken: (Ormrod LJ) ‘In a case such as this ‘needs’ can be regarded as equivalent to ‘reasonable requirements’, taking into account the other … Continue reading Page v Page: CA 1981

The parties, foreign nationals, had married abroad. The came to live here, but H returned in 1996. W sought to pre-empt proceedings abroad by divorcing here getting a decree nisi. She began ancillary relief proceedings, and was awarded maintenance pending suit which was paid, but H failed to co-operate with the ancillary relief application beyond … Continue reading W v W (Decree Absolute): FD 31 Mar 1998

Judges: Bruce Blair QC J Citations: [2008] EWHC 2553 (Fam) Links: Bailii Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 31 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Family Updated: 30 July 2022; Ref: scu.347364

The husband appealed against an ancillary relief order, and particularly as to an order that he should continue to pay maintenance for the joint lives of the parties rater than for five years. He was earning a substantial income but anticipated that he might lose that income within a few years. The court had said … Continue reading S v S: FD 19 Mar 2008

The court examined its jurisdiction to hear an appeal on an ancillary relief application where one party had remarried. Judges: Thorpe LJ, Wall LJ, Stanley Burnton LJ Citations: [2008] EWCA Civ 1049, [2009] 1 FLR 983, [2009] Fam Law 184 Links: Bailii Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 28(3) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – … Continue reading Whitehouse-Piper v Stokes: CA 15 Jul 2008

A husband earning pounds 41,000 per year had been ordered to pay maintenance to his wife at pounds 18,000pa and for children at pounds 7956pa reduced to half his earnings at pounds 1,000 per month. There is a need always to judge the award against s25 checklist. Adjusted approach was conventional. Citations: Gazette 18-Nov-1998, [1998] … Continue reading Scheeres v Scheeres: CA 23 Sep 1998

H had been granted a divorce on the grounds of W’s adultery. The court considered how the clean break provisions could be incorporated in a situation with children and how conduct might affect periodical payments. Held: The duty to consider a clean break applies whether or not there are children. The judge had erred in … Continue reading Suter v Suter and Jones: CA 19 Dec 1986

In an ancillary relief action it had been anticipated that the husband would at a future time inherit a substantial amount. An order was made but an express order for a capital sum was adjourned. The wife then remarried, and later, and after the wife’s second marriage had come to an end, the former husband … Continue reading K (formerly G) v G: FD 28 Jan 2004

The parties disputed an ancillary relief claim on their divorce. The husband had been suicidally depressed. The wife had committed adultery over a long time and also assisted her husband’s failed suicide. The husband now sought to rely upon her behaviour, saying it would be inequitable to ignore it. Held: The husband’s appeal was allowed. … Continue reading Kyte v Kyte: CA 22 Jul 1987

The parties had been married before and had signed a prenuptial agreement. Held: Thorpe LJ set out the duties of a judge in ancillary relief applications: ‘A judge has to do fairness between the parties, having regard to all the circumstances. He must be free to include within that discretionary review the factors which compelled … Continue reading G v G (Financial Provision: Separation Agreement): CA 28 Jun 2000

The court has no power to dismiss an applicant’s claim for periodical payments against her will. Citations: [1981] Fam 31, [1980] 1 FLR 286 Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 25 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Mentioned – Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane HL 24-May-2006 Fairness on Division of Family Capital The House faced … Continue reading Dipper v Dipper: CA 1980

Appeal from order setting aside decree absolute of divorce – finding of fraud as to length of separation. Judges: Lord Justice Moylan Citations: [2020] EWCA Civ 1740 Links: Bailii Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Family Updated: 25 May 2022; Ref: scu.656881

Where W had substantial capital assets, but little income, and the husband’s position was the reverse, it was not open to her to plead that a divorce should be refused on the grounds of exceptional hardship. Loss of pension in this case was insufficient. Citations: Times 23-Nov-1998 Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 5 Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Archer v Archer: CA 23 Nov 1998

The parties had married in 1973, separated in 1976, and divorce proceedings begun in 1977. W suffered bad health and did not work. H had a position as a senior editor of a newspaper. Held: The periodical payments order should provide support for W during her ill health, but not for life. A lump sum … Continue reading Robertson v Robertson: FD 1982

Both parties sought a variation of a maintenance order. The former husband sought to be allowed to pay a sufficient capital sum to his former wife to commute the payment in her favour. Held: Provided the sum could be paid and the result would not prejudice the arrangements for the children the variation sought by … Continue reading S v S: FD 1986

H had mortgaged the matrimonial home to release funds to support his lifestyle. The bank knew about the family circumstances and the mortgage was set aside at first instance. W applied to have the charge set aside. Held: The application failed. The charge had been executed long before W had commenced her claims. The Court … Continue reading Kemmis v Kemmis (Welland and Others Intervening): CA 1988

A finding in ancillary relief proceedings is not binding on others who were not themselves parties, and third parties should be allowed to be joined if necessary.Lord Denning MR said: ‘It seems to me that, under section 24 of the 1973 Act, if an intervenor comes in making a claim for the property, then it … Continue reading Tebbutt v Haynes: 1981

A bigamist is unable to claim ancillary relief in the second marriage; would be against public policy. Since bigamy was a serious crime which undermined fundamental notions of monogamous marriage, the Court would not as a matter of public policy entertain an application for financial relief under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 from a person … Continue reading Whiston v Whiston: CA 8 May 1995

(Isle of Man) The parties had signed a post-nuptial agreement. Held: It was not open to the courts to find that such agreements might be enforced. They had been unenforceable under common law, and if the law was to be changed it must be by statute. There was an enormous difference in principle and in … Continue reading Macleod v Macleod: PC 17 Dec 2008

The wife appealed an ancillary relief order for equal division on the basis that the judge had failed to allow for the fact that most of the assets had been brought to the marriage by her. Held: Her appeal succeeded. All the assets at the start of the marriage were hers, and the parties had … Continue reading B v B (Ancillary relief: Distribution of assets): CA 19 Mar 2008

Mr and Mrs Duxbury had been married for 22 years. When, at the end of their marriage, their financial affairs came before the court under the provisions of sections 23 and 24 of the 1973 Act, each wanted a clean break. By the standards of the day, Mr. Duxbury was a wealthy man, and a … Continue reading Duxbury v Duxbury: CA 1987

The wife appealed against an order refusing to set aside an earlier order for ancillary relief in her divorce proeedings, arguing that it had been made under a mistake. The sum available for division had had deducted an expected liabiliity to the Inland Revenue and otherwise in respect of failed business. The husband had prepared … Continue reading Judge v Judge and others: CA 19 Dec 2008

Petitions with Identical Particulars Dismissed 28 divorce petitions had particulars including the exact same form of words for the allegations. The court could not accept that the behaviour had been identical and concluded that the petitions were improper. Held: The petitions were dismissed. A reference to the DPP was not necessary, Moor J [2021] EWFC … Continue reading Yorston and Others, Re (Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Improper Petitions): FC 10 Sep 2021

The court considered a petition for divorce beased upon unreasonable behaviour. The Wife petitioner appealed from the decision dismissing her petition for the dissolution of her marriage to the respondent. Held: After discussing O’Neill: ‘one looks to this husband and this wife, or vice versa, but one also looks at what is reasonable. That is … Continue reading Buffery v Buffery: CA 30 Nov 1987

After divorce proceedings had commenced, the wife visited the husband, then living with someone else, and stabbed him. She now appealed an order for maintenance reduced because of her conduct.
Held: The conduct was clearly gross and obvious, . .

. .

W appealed against orders in ancillary relief proceedings saying that the award made to her husband was excessive. . .

The husband’s petition was based on section 1(2)(e) of the 1973 Act, namely that he and the wife had lived apart for at least five years. The Court of Appeal upheld the judge’s rejection of the wife’s opposition to the grant of a decree, which was . .

The husband had obtained a decree absolute of divorce against his wife. The matrimonial home had been conveyed to them jointly. He remarried and applied to the court for variation of the post-nuptial settlement. He died before the application was . .

The court considered an application for ancillary relief. The assets were substantial, but before the judge was to deliver his judgment he accepted evidence from the husand that the sale of his business had fallen through and H’s income substantially reduced.The judge had achieved a clean break by allocating properties to the respective parties, giving … Continue reading Wells v Wells: CA 20 Mar 2002

A court has no power to make an interim order for the purchase of a house for the wife and children pending determination of the overall ancillary application. The result sought by the wife could have been achieved by application under section 17 of the Act of 1882, but ‘The power [under s.17] to order … Continue reading Wicks v Wicks: CA 29 Dec 1997

Citations: [2013] EWCA Civ 41, [2011] 2 FLR 478 Links: Bailii Statutes: Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 35 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Kremen v Agrest FD 15-Oct-2010 Application as to payment of funds held where the payer was a fugitive from justice, owing sums in maintenance to the claimant. W applied for … Continue reading Kremen v Agrest: CA 5 Feb 2013

The parties had obtained an ancillary relief order by consent. That order was later varied at the request of the wife. The husband now appealed against the order saying it was not open to him to vary what had been agreed to. Judges: Thorpe, Kitchin LJJ, Baron J Citations: [2013] EWCA Civ 13 Links: Bailii … Continue reading Hamilton v Hamilton: CA 24 Jan 2013

The parties had married, but the male partner was a transsexual, having been born female and having undergone treatment for Gender Identity Dysphoria. After IVF treatment, the couple had a child. As the marriage broke down the truth was revealed in court, but the plaintiff said that his wife had known the true position. He … Continue reading J v S T (Formerly J): CA 21 Nov 1996

Both husband and wife had independent means, and neither worked. The wife had spent pounds 100,000k on Children Act proceedings, and sought ancillary relief. The judge had made an order on capital to reflect the fact that if those costs had not been spent W would have had the money available as capital. Held: Whilst … Continue reading Tavoulareas v Tavoulareas (2): CA 19 Nov 1996

The marriage had been short, there were no children, both parties were working, and each could support themselves providing themselves with accomodation. The wife had successfully appealed a finding of the district judge for an equal distribution. The husband sought to restore it. Held: The district judge’s findings were not so wrong (if at all) … Continue reading Foster v Foster: CA 16 Apr 2003