In re W (Children); CA 4-Jul-2007

Court: CA
Date: 04-Jul-2007
Links: Bailii,
References: [2007] EWCA Civ 753,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Children

Mcallister -v- Belfast City Council; NIIT 4-Jul-2007

NIIT The decision of the tribunal is that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear and to determine, firstly, the claimant’s complaint of unlawful discrimination on grounds of religion and political opinion and, secondly, the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal. Both the complaints are dismissed by the tribunal, without further order.

Court: NIIT
Date: 04-Jul-2007
Links: Bailii,
References: [2007] NIIT 59_06,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment, Northern Ireland

Morgan -v- Carmichael; FENI 4-Jul-2007

The unanimous decision of the Tribunal is that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered discrimination as a result of his religion or political opinion. He was also entitled to unpaid holiday pay.

Court: FENI
Date: 04-Jul-2007
Links: Bailii,
References: [2007] NIFET 183_04,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Discrimination, Northern Ireland

Kocak And Others -v- Turkey; ECHR 21-Dec-2006

Court: ECHR
Date: 21-Dec-2006
Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights
Links: Bailii,
References: 23720/02, [2006] ECHR 1138,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Human Rights

3 Avondale Road – Eastbourne : Midland : Birmingham; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Houses/Flats – Enfranchisement, Lease Extensions & Compensation for Loss

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT CHI_LV_HEL_21UC_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Flat 1 22 Avondale Road – Croydon : London; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Service Charges

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00AH_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

34 Invicta Road – Greenwich : London; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Service Charges

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00AL_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

6 & 7 Vicarage Gate – Kensington and Chelsea : London; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Service Charges

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00AW_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Millington Court Mill Lane – Wealden : Midland : Birmingham; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Service Charges

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT CHI_LV_SVC_21UH_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Granville Square – Southwark : London; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Service Charges

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00BE_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Flat 3 50 Sutherland Avenue – Westminster : London; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Appointment of Manager

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT LON_LV_AOM_00BK_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

118 Como Street – Havering : London; LVT 11-Sep-2006

LVT Variation of Leases

Court: LVT
Date: 11-Sep-2006
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWLVT LON_LV_VOL_00AR_0

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Ye Hung Wu for Judicial Review of A Decision By the Secretary of State for the Home Department; OHCS 11-Aug-2006

Court: OHCS
Date: 11-Aug-2006
Judges: Lord Brodie
Links: ScotC,
References:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immigration, Scotland

Sanderson, Griffin -v- Exel Management Services Limited; EAT 12-May-2006

EAT Working Time Regulations – (no sub-topic).

Court: EAT
Date: 12-May-2006
Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Silber
Links: EAT,
References: UKEAT/0194/06,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment

Lait -v- Williams and Another; TCC 23-Mar-2006

Court: TCC
Date: 23-Mar-2006
Judges: Peter Coulson QC
Links: Bailii,
References: [2006] EWHC 633 (TCC),

Leave a Comment

Filed under Nuisance

Regione Autonoma Della Sardegna -v- Commission; ECFI 14-Dec-2005

ECFI State Aid – Measures of the Italian authorities to offset the damage caused by ovine catarrhal fever (bluetongue) – Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural sector

Court: ECFI
Date: 14-Dec-2005
Links: Bailii,
References: T-200/04, [2005] EUECJ T-200/04

Leave a Comment

Filed under Agriculture, European

Delgable Ltd -v- Perinpanathan; CA 14-Dec-2005

Court: CA
Date: 14-Dec-2005
Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Links: Bailii,
References: [2005] EWCA Civ 1724,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Broniowski -v- Poland; ECHR 28-Sep-2005

Court: ECHR
Date: 28-Sep-2005
Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights
Links: Bailii,
References: 31443/96, [2005] ECHR 647,
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Human Rights

Halton International Inc (Holding) and Another -v- Guernroy Ltd; ChD 9-Sep-2005

Court: ChD
Date: 09-Sep-2005
Judges: Patten J
Links: Bailii,
References: [2005] EWHC 1968 (Ch),
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Company

Walker -v- Milton Keynes General NHS Trust; Admn 8-Jul-2005

Court: Admn
Date: 08-Jul-2005
Judges: Frances Kirkham J
Links: Bailii,
References: [2005] EWHC 3095 (Admin),

Leave a Comment

Filed under Personal Injury, Professional Negligence

Clowes Developments (UK) Ltd. -v- Walters and others; ChD 20-Apr-2005

Court: ChD
Date: 20-Apr-2005
Links: Bailii,
References: [2005] EWHC 669 (Ch),

Leave a Comment

Filed under Limitation, Registered Land

McCann -v- C & S Hunter & Sons (Contractors) Ltd; NIIT 16-Feb-2005

Redundancy pay award.

Court: NIIT
Date: 16-Feb-2005
Links: Bailii,
References: [2005] NIIT 2692_04,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment, Northern Ireland

Triodos Bank Nv -v- Dobbs and Another; ChD 8-Feb-2005

Court: ChD
Date: 08-Feb-2005
Judges: The Hon Mr Justice Lightman
Links: Bailii,
References: [2005] EWHC 108 (Ch),
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Contract

Pinnacle Cloud Solutions Ltd -v- Braveheart Technology Ltd and Others; SCS 28-Oct-2014

Outer House, Court of Session – Order on settlement of associated principle action.

Court: SCS
Date: 28-Oct-2014
Judges: Lord Tyre
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSOH_154,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Scotland

In The Petition of Tesco Stores Ltd for Judicial Review of A Decision of Perth and Kinross Council Dated 13 November 2013; SCS 23-Oct-2014

Outer House, Court of Session – petition for judicial review concerns a decision by the Perth and Kinross Council the relevant planning authority, to agree to the removal of a condition in an agreement between itself and Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited.

Court: SCS
Date: 23-Oct-2014
Judges: Lord Glennie
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSOH_153,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Planning, Scotland

Nationwide Gritting Services Ltd -v- The Scottish Ministers; SCS 17-Oct-2014

Outer House, Court of Session – NGS claims that the defenders breached public procurement law by failing to hold a competitive tendering procedure in the purchase of gritting salt.

Court: SCS
Date: 17-Oct-2014
Judges: Lord Woolman
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSOH_151,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Administrative, Scotland

Bishop -v- 3I Investments Plc; SCS 17-Oct-2014

Outer House Court of Session

Court: SCS
Date: 17-Oct-2014
Judges: Lord Woolman
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSOH_152,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment, Financial Services, Scotland

Royal Bank of Scotland Plc -v- ODonnell and Mcdonald; SCS 16-Oct-2014

Extra Division Inner House Court of Session. The reclaimers have brought proceedings against the respondents to enforce a guarantee that the respondents had purportedly granted in support of the borrowings of a company controlled by them. The respondents have counterclaimed for reduction of the guarantee on the ground that it was induced by misrepresentations made by the reclaimers.

Court: SCS
Date: 16-Oct-2014
Judges: Lord Bracadale, Lord Drummond Young, Lord Wheatley
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSIH_84,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Banking, Scotland, Torts - Other

In The Application For Leave To Appeal Under The Tribunals and Courts Enforcement Act 2007 Section 13 By IU and Others; SCS 16-Oct-2014

Extra Division, Inner House Court of Session

Court: SCS
Date: 16-Oct-2014
Judges: Lady Clark of Calton
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSIH_85,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immigration, Scotland

T Clarke (Scotland) Ltd -v- Mmaxx Underfloor Heating Ltd; SCS 15-Oct-2014

A reclaiming motion by the pursuer against an interlocutor by which the Lord Ordinary refused to grant interim interdict against the respondent and defender from referring for adjudication any disputes arising from a contract between the pursuer and the defender.

Court: SCS
Date: 15-Oct-2014
Judges: Lord Eassie, Lord Bracadale, Lord Drummond Young
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSIH_83,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Contract, Scotland

Gray -v- Watson and Others; SCS 8-Oct-2014

Reclaiming motion is brought in a petition for judicial review.

Court: SCS
Date: 08-Oct-2014
Judges: Lord Eassie, Lord Menzies, Lord Malcolm
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] ScotCS CSIH_81,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Company, Scotland

Danosa -v- LKB Lizing SIA; ECJ 2-Sep-2010

ECJ Opinion – Social Policy – Directive 92/85 – Scope – Member of executive committee of a company – Worker – Existence of a relationship – Legislation authorizing the dismissal of a member of the Executive Committee of unrestricted capital company considering her pregnancy – Equal treatment for men and women.

Court: ECJ
Date: 02-Sep-2010
Judges: Bot AG
Statutes: Directive 92/85
Links: Bailii,
References: C-232/09, [2010] EUECJ C-232/09
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Discrimination, European

Doorga Prosad Chamaria -v- The Secretary of State; PC 18-Jan-1945

Fort William (Bengal)

Court: PC
Date: 18-Jan-1945
Links: Bailii,
References: [1945] UKPC 3,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth

Coleman -v- Attridge Law, Law; ECJ 17-Jul-2008

ECJ Grand Chamber – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Articles 1, 2(1), (2)(a) and (3) and 3(1)(c) – Direct discrimination on grounds of disability – Harassment related to disability – Dismissal of an employee who is not himself disabled but whose child is disabled – Included – Burden of proof

Court: ECJ
Date: 17-Jul-2008
Statutes: Directive 2000/78/EC 1 2(1) 2(2)(a) 3
Links: Bailii,
References: [2008] EUECJ C-303/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:415
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Discrimination, European

Halawi -v- WDFG UK Ltd (T/A World Duty Free); CA 28-Oct-2014

The claimant said that she had been discriminated against on the grounds of her religion. She worked as a beauty consultant at the airport, but through a limited company. Her airside pass had been withdrawn. She now appealed against rejection of her claim that she was a worker by both the Employment Tribunal and by the Employment Appeal tribunal.

Court: CA
Date: 28-Oct-2014
Judges: Arden, Christopher Clarke LJJ, Barling J
Statutes: Framework Directive 2000/78, Equality Act 2010 83
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] EWCA Civ 1387,
Cases Cited:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Discrimination

Lyallpur Bank Limited -v- Ramji Das (Deceased) Through His Sons, and Others; PC 18-Jan-1945

Oudh

Court: PC
Date: 18-Jan-1945
Links: Bailii,
References: [1945] UKPC 2,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth

Barwick -v- English Joint Stock Bank; 1867

When considering the vicarious liability of a master for the acts of his servant, no sensible distinction could be drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule was that: ‘the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master’s benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved’ (my emphasis).’It is true, [the master] has not authorized the particular act, but he has put the agent in his place to do that class of acts, and he must be answerable for the manner in which the agent has conducted himself in doing the business which it was the act of his master to place him in.’

Date: 01-Jan-1867
Judges: Willes J
References: (1867) LR 2 Ex 259,
Cited By:
  • Dubai Aluminium Company Limited -v- Salaam and Others, HL, Cited, (House of Lords, Times 06-Dec-02, Bailii, [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep 65, [2002] UKHL 48, [2002] 3 WLR 1913, [2003] 2 AC 366, [2003] 1 All ER 97, [2003] 2 All ER (Comm) 451, [2003] 1 LLR 65, [2003] 1 BCLC 32, [2003] IRLR 608, [2003] 1 CLC 1020, [2003] WTLR 163)
  • Lister and Others -v- Hesley Hall Ltd, HL, Cited, (Times 10-May-01, Gazette 14-Jun-01, Bailii, House of Lords, [2001] UKHL 22, [2002] 1 AC 215, [2001] 2 All ER 769, [2001] 2 FCR 97, (2001) 3 LGLR 49, [2001] NPC 89, [2001] Fam Law 595, [2001] 2 WLR 1311, [2001] IRLR 472, [2001] ICR 665, [2001] Emp LR 819, [2001] 2 FLR 307, [2001] ELR 422)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Vicarious Liability

Danosa -v- LKB Lizing SIA; ECJ 11-Nov-2010

ECJ Social policy – Directive 92/85/EEC – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding – Articles 2(a) and 10 – Concept of ‘pregnant worker’ – Prohibition on the dismissal of a pregnant worker during the period from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave – Directive 76/207/EEC – Equal treatment for men and women – Member of the Board of Directors of a capital company – National legislation permitting the dismissal of a Board Member without any restrictions

Court: ECJ
Date: 11-Nov-2010
Judges: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, P
Statutes: Directive 92/85/EEC
Links: Bailii,
References: [2010] EUECJ C-232/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:674,, [2011] 2 CMLR 2
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Discrimination, Employment, European

Yewens -v- Noakes; CA 1880

Bramwell LJ stated: ‘A person was an employee if his employer has the right to control not only what work he does but the way in which that work is done.’
An employee is ‘a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work’, and the master is liable for his acts, neglects and defaults, to the extent specified.

Court: CA
Date: 01-Jan-1880
Judges: Bramwell LJ
References: (1880) 6 QBD 530,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment, Vicarious Liability

D & L Caterers Ltd -v- DAjou; 1945

Damages in favour of a corporate body in defamation cases are limited to financial damage.

Date: 01-Jan-1945
References: [1945] KB 364,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Damages, Defamation

Roberts -v- J & F Stone Lighting and Radio Ltd; 1945

Claim for damages against witness who fails to attend court though summonsed when the case was lost.
Held: the reason why no such claim had in fact succeeded was because of the difficulty in establishing the loss.

Date: 01-Jan-1945
Judges: Asquith J
References: (1945) 172 LT 240,
Cited By:
  • Re N, CA, Cited, (Bailii, [1999] EWCA Civ 1452, [1999] Lloyd's Rep Med 257)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Torts - Other

Cole -v- Harris; 1945

The court was aksed whether a single room was let as a separate dwelling.
Held: Sharing of the use of a bathroom or toilet need not prevent a tenancy being protected.

Date: 01-Jan-1945
References: [1945] KB 474,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Picken -v- Lord Balfour of Burleigh; CA 1945

The rules of a pension scheme set up by a railway company provided for members’ contributions to be deducted from their salary, but in practice the deductions made had been less than they should have been.
Held: The rule in Cherry v Boultbee applied and the members were not entitled to receive their full pension without the under-contribution being first made good, even if by deduction.
Lord Greene MR said: ‘Whether that be so or not, it seems to me that, even if the only method of contribution provided for by the rule is that of deduction, that would not prevent the equitable principle from applying. When that principle is applied the recipient is deemed to have in his hands the money that he is claiming up to the amount of the deficiency in his own payments. Precisely the same thing must apply to the present case even if the only thing that the member contracted to do was to pay by way of deduction. Look at it how you will, this member has not contributed enough. In so far as his contributions are defective in amount, he has under-paid, under-contributed, and it would be, it seems to me, grossly inequitable that a man in that position could be heard to say: ‘Although I have not made the contributions by way of deduction which I ought to have made, I am now going to say that the application of the equitable rule is not permissible because that would involve making me contribute otherwise than by deduction, which is a thing I never contracted to do.’ That seems to me to be quite a wrong view of the way in which the equitable principle works. My decision does not result in forcing the plaintiffs to make an actual contribution otherwise than by way of deduction. If they come to make a claim then they have to do what is right and bring the fund up to its right level before they can claim to participate in it.’

Court: CA
Date: 01-Jan-1945
Judges: Lord Greene MR
References: [1945] Ch 90,
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Trusts

Cabell -v- Markham; 1945

In discussing the purposive approach to the interpretation of statutes, the judge held: ‘Of course it is true that the words used, even in their literal sense, are the primary, and ordinarily the most reliable, source of interpreting the meaning of any writing: be it a statute, a contract, or anything else. But it is one of the surest indexes of a mature developed jurisprudence not to make a fortress out of the dictionary; but to remember that statutes always have some purpose or object to accomplish, whose sympathetic and imaginative discovery is the surest guide to their meaning.’

Date: 01-Jan-1945
Judges: Justice Learned Hand
References: (1945) 148 F 2d 737,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Constitutional

Rose -v- Plenty; CA 7-Jul-1975

Contrary to his employers orders, a milkman allowed children to assist him in his milkround. One was injured, and sued the milkman’s employer.
Held: The milkman had not gone so far outside the activities for which he was employed for the employer to escape liability. ‘The servant was, of course, employed at the time of the accident to do a whole number of operations. He was certainly not employed to give the boy a lift, and if one confines one’s analysis of the facts to the incident of injury to the plaintiff, then no doubt one would say that carrying the boy on the float – giving him a lift – was not in the course of the servant’s employment.’ After referring to Ilkiw. ‘he was employed as a roundsman to drive his float round his round and to deliver milk, to collect empties and to obtain payment. That was his job. . . He chose to disregard the prohibition and to enlist the assistance of the plaintiff. As a matter of common sense, that does seem to me to be a mode, albeit a prohibited mode, of doing the job with which he was entrusted. Why was the plaintiff being carried on the float when the accident occurred? Because it was necessary to take him from point to point so that he could assist in delivering milk, collecting empties and, on occasions obtaining payment.’
(Lawton LJ dissenting)

Court: CA
Date: 07-Jul-1975
Judges: Scarman LJ, Lord Denning MR,
Links: Bailii,
References: [1976] 1 WLR 141, [1975] EWCA Civ 5, [1976] 1 All ER 97, [1975] ICR 430
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Vicarious Liability

Cruh -v- Cruh; 1945

A man of Austrian or German origin had been recommended for deportation following a conviction for conspiracy. The Home Secretary intended to deport him as soon as it became practicable to do so.
Held: Until the recommendation was actually effected, the domicile of choice remained. Once that happens, however, the domicile is lost. Even though a party’s immigration status was such that he might be ordered to be removed, he could nevertheless acquire a domicile of choice in this country.

Date: 01-Jan-1945
Judges: Denning J
References: [1945] 2 All ER 545,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Family

Peek -v- Towler; 1945

A driver of a vehicle who had been involved in an accident, remained under a duty to report the accident and to provide his particulars whether or not he had been requested to do so: ‘It would be a remarkable state of affairs if . . The obligations should only arise in cases where there has been some bystander who has asked for these particulars and where there has been a failue to comply with his request.’

Date: 01-Jan-1945
Judges: Tucker J
Statutes: Road Traffic Act 1930 822(2)
References: [1945] KB 458,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Road Traffic

Neale -v- Del Soto; CA 1945

A letting of two of a number of rooms in a property together with joint use with the landlord of the kitchen, bathroom, lavatory and conservatory was not a letting of the two rooms as a separate dwelling, but a sharing of the property. The letting was not secure.

Court: CA
Date: 01-Jan-1945
References: [1945] KB 144, [1945] 1 All ER 191
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Housing, Landlord and Tenant

Docherty -v- H M Advocate; 1945

At trial, the judge had failed to make clear to the jury that the conviction of the appellant on a charge of murder depended on whether there was satisfactory proof of having acted in concert with others.
Held: Lord Moncrieff commented on an illustration which the trial judge had given to the jury in the course of his charge, saying: ‘It is true that if people acting in concert have reason to expect that a lethal weapon will be used – and their expectation may be demonstrated by various circumstances, as, for example, if they themselves have carried arms or if they know that arms and lethal weapons are being carried by their associates – they may then under the law with regard to concert each one of them become guilty of murder if the weapon is used with fatal results by one of them. In view of their assumed expectation that it might be used, and of their having joined together in an act of violence apt to be completed by its use, they will be assumed in law to have authorised the use of the fatal weapon, and so to have incurred personal responsibility for using it. If, on the other hand, they had no reason to expect that any one among them would resort to any such act of violence, the mere fact that they were associated in minor violence would not be conclusive against them; and the lethal act, as being unexpected, will not be ascribed to a joint purpose so as to make others than the principal actor responsible for the act’. This distinction had the support of many authorities. Secondary responsibility for a criminal act arises only in cases of reasonable expectation. Commenting on the circumstances of the case: ‘But in this case the weapon which was used was a hatchet which was the property of the appellant and which must have been present visibly in the room; and it seems to me that in these circumstances either of the assailants must have ascribed to him a common expectation that in the stress of the event the other might snatch up anything which was handy and which was adapted to achieve the joint purpose’.

Date: 01-Jan-1945
Judges: Lord Moncrieff
References: 1945 J C 89,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Crime, Scotland

Nahhas -v- Pier House (Cheyne Walk) Management Ltd; 1984

A payment by a third party insurance broker to the daughter of a valued client made for benevolent and commercial reasons did not reduce the claim on the tortfeasor a position which would also, should it have been necessary, have been justified by the ordinary principles of subrogation.

Date: 01-Jan-1984
Judges: Mr Denis Henry QC
References: [1984] 1 EGLR 160, (1984) 270 EG 328

Leave a Comment

Filed under Vicarious Liability

Scp Huglo, Lepage &Amp; Associes, Conseil -v- France; ECHR 1-Feb-2005

ECHR Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Violation of Art. 6-1; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient; Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) – claim dismissed; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings.

Court: ECHR
Date: 01-Feb-2005
Links: ECHR, Bailii, Bailii,
References: 59477/00, [2005] ECHR 50,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Human Rights

Lewis -v- Governing Body of John Beddoes School and Another; EAT 17-Nov-2004

EAT Unfair Dismissal – Compensation.

Court: EAT
Date: 17-Nov-2004
Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Rimer
Links: EAT,
References: UKEAT/0422/04,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment

Learning & Skills Council -v- The Public and Commercial Services Union; QBD 3-Nov-2004

Application by the claimants for an interlocutary injunction against the defendants to prevent a strike by the defendants.

Court: QBD
Date: 03-Nov-2004
Judges: Pitchers J
Statutes: Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 221
Links: Bailii,
References: [2004] EWHC 2930 (QB),

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment

Key Property Ionvestments Ltd -v- Customs and Excise; VDT 30-Sep-2004

VDT Reasonable excuse appeal

Court: VDT
Date: 30-Sep-2004
Links: Bailii,
References: [2004] UKVAT V18771,

Leave a Comment

Filed under VAT

Haddock -v- Customs and Excise; VDT 30-Sep-2004

Directions – reasonable excuse appeal.

Court: VDT
Date: 30-Sep-2004
Links: Bailii,
References: [2004] UKVAT V18777,

Leave a Comment

Filed under VAT

CAV Electrical Ltd -v- Customs and Excise; VDT 30-Sep-2004

VDT SECURITY ? Company Director’s involvement in previously failed companies – Whether respondents where reasonable in requiring security – Yes – VAT Act 1994 Schedule 11 Paragraph 4 – Appeal dismissed

Court: VDT
Date: 30-Sep-2004
Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994
Links: Bailii,
References: [2004] UKVAT V18774,

Leave a Comment

Filed under VAT

Hawksley Engineering Ltd -v- Customs & Excise; VDT 6-May-2004

Reasonable excuse appeal.

Court: VDT
Date: 06-May-2004
Links: Bailii,
References: [2004] UKVAT V18611,

Leave a Comment

Filed under VAT

Triodos Bank, Dobbs, Acorn Televillages Limited -v-Dobbs, Acorn TelevillaFGacages Limited, Morrison Gerrard and Triodos Bank Nv; ChD 19-Apr-2004

Court: ChD
Date: 19-Apr-2004
Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Lewison
Links: Bailii,
References: [2004] EWHC 845 (Ch),
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Banking, Professional Negligence

Lewis -v- Customs & Excise; Excs 28-Aug-2003

Excs EXCISE DUTIES – Importation of 30 kilograms of hand rolling tobacco together with cigarettes, spirits and other goods – Forfeiture of vehicle and goods – Whether review decision not to restore vehicle and goods was reasonable – Appeal dismissed

Court: Excs
Date: 28-Aug-2003
Links: Bailii,
References: [2003] UKVAT-Excise E00486,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Customs and Excise

Mark: CARS DIRECT; TMR 31-Jul-2003

IPO Opposition.

Court: TMR
Date: 31-Jul-2003
Judges: Mr D Landau
Statutes: Trade Marks Act 1994
Links: IPO,
References: 2227004,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Intellectual Property

Mark: CARS DIRECT; TMR 31-Jul-2003

IPO Invalidity.

Court: TMR
Date: 31-Jul-2003
Judges: Mr D Landau
Statutes: Trade Marks Act 1994
Links: IPO,
References: 2019522,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Intellectual Property

Orchard Court Residents Association -v- St Anthonys Homes Ltd; CA 2003

Court: CA
Date: 01-Jan-2003
Statutes: Lands Tribunal Act 1949 3(4), Landlord and Tenant Act 1987
References: [2003] 2 EGLR 28,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Re Loquitur Ltd; ChD 2003

Court: ChD
Date: 01-Jan-2003
Judges: Etherton J
References: [2003] 2 BCLC 442, [2003] EWHC 999 (Ch)
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Company

Savona -v- Italie (No 2); ECHR 12-Feb-2002

Court: ECHR
Date: 12-Feb-2002
Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights
Links: Bailii, Bailii,
References: 52977/99, [2002] ECHR 79,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Human Rights

The Thrombosis Research Institute and Trigen Limited -v- West Pharmaceutical Services Drug Delivery and Clinical Research Centre Limited (Formerly Danbiosyst) Or, In The Case of The Usa, Peter Watts (Patent); IPO 6-Feb-2002

IPO The claimant requested that the comptroller decline to deal with a reference under section 12(2) on the grounds of the complexity of the issues. The defendant consented to the request, but on the grounds that there were substantially identical grounds before the High Court.
The request was refused on claimants grounds, but granted on the defendants grounds.

Court: IPO
Date: 06-Feb-2002
Judges: Mr D J Barford
Statutes: Patents Act 1977 12
Links: Bailii,
References: [2002] UKIntelP o05802, PCT/GB98/03511

Leave a Comment

Filed under Intellectual Property

Hussain -v- Addaction and Another; EAT 23-Oct-2001

EAT Procedural Issues – Employment Appeal Tribunal

Court: EAT
Date: 23-Oct-2001
Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Lindsay (President)
Links: Bailii, EAT,
References: EAT/0755/00, [2001] UKEAT 0755_00_2310

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment

Hussain -v- City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council; LT 9-Aug-2001

LT COMPENSATION – compulsory acquisition of commercial and residential property – comparables rejected – authority’s valuation increased

Court: LT
Date: 09-Aug-2001
Judges: P H Clarke FRICS
Links: Bailii,
References: [2001] EWLands ACQ_133_2000,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Damages, Land

Fidan And Others -v- Turkey; ECHR 10-Jul-2001

Court: ECHR
Date: 10-Jul-2001
Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights
Links: Bailii,
References: 29885/96, [2001] ECHR 449, 29883/96, 29884/96

Leave a Comment

Filed under Human Rights

Regina -v- Richmond London Borough Council, Ex Parte Watson; Regina -v- Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, Ex Parte Armstrong etc; Admn 15-Oct-1999

Court: Admn
Date: 15-Oct-1999
Links: Bailii,
References: [1999] EWHC Admin 749, [2000] LGR 318
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Local Government

Schuldenfrei -v- Hilton (Her Majestys Inspector of Taxes); CA 16-Jul-1999

Where an inspector issued an assessment to tax, but mistakenly completed it to say that no tax was payable, and the taxpayer did nothing to indicate reliance upon it, there was no agreement between the taxpayer and the inspector such as would prevent the collector of taxes withdrawing and amending the assessment.

Court: CA
Date: 16-Jul-1999
Statutes: Taxes Management Act 1970 54
Links: Times, Gazette,
References: [1999] EWCA Civ 1869,
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Capital Gains Tax, Taxes Management

Regina -v- Pembrokeshire County Council ex parte Coker and Minty; Admn 1-Jul-1999

Grant of lease.

Court: Admn
Date: 01-Jul-1999
Links: Bailii,
References: [1999] EWHC Admin 623,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Local Government

Brennan -v- Brighton Borough Council; CA 23-Apr-1998

Court: CA
Date: 23-Apr-1998
References: [1998] EWCA Civ 689,
Cases Cited:
  • Pontin -v- Wood, CA, Cited, ([1962] 1 QB 594, [1962] 2 WLR 258, [1962] 1 All ER 294)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Company, Torts - Other

Tariq -v- Malik; CA 2-Dec-1997

Appeal against possession order – Rent arrears.

Court: CA
Date: 02-Dec-1997
Links: Bailii,
References: [1997] EWCA Civ 2873,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Landlord and Tenant

Regina -v- National Trust for Places of Historic Interest Or Natural Beauty ex parte Scott, Summerskill and others; Admn 16-Jul-1997

Court: Admn
Date: 16-Jul-1997
References: [1997] EWHC Admin 694,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Charity, Judicial Review

Hamilton -v- Weston; CA 23-Jan-1997

Court: CA
Date: 23-Jan-1997
Judges: Waite, Henry LJJ
Links: Bailii,
References: [1997] EWCA Civ 830,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Land

TNT Express (UK) Ltd -v- Downes and others; EAT 23-Jun-1993

Court: EAT
Date: 23-Jun-1993
Links: Bailii,
References: [1993] UKEAT 357_92_2306,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employment

Southern Pacific Insurance Company (Fiji) Limited -v- The Commissioner of Inland Revenue; PC 24-Feb-1986

Fiji

Court: PC
Date: 24-Feb-1986
Links: Bailii,
References: [1986] UKPC 14,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth

Regina -v- District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council ex parte West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council; 1986

Date: 01-Jan-1986
References: [1986] RVR 24,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Rating, Trusts

In Re James; 1932

A legacy for the setting up and operation of a home of rest for the sisters of a religious community was a valid charitable bequest, on the basis that it was to be provided for persons in need of such a facility or amenity.

Date: 01-Jan-1932
Judges: Farwell J
References: [1932] 2 Ch 25,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Charity

Azima Bibi Since Deceased (Now Represented By Dewan Amir Hossein Khan and Another and Others -v- Munshi Shamalanand; PC 26-Nov-1912

Fort William (Bengal)

Court: PC
Date: 26-Nov-1912
Links: Bailii,
References: [1912] UKPC 92,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth

George A Pearson -v- Thomas R OBrien and Another; PC 12-Nov-1912

Manitoba

Court: PC
Date: 12-Nov-1912
Links: Bailii,
References: [1912] UKPC 81,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth

The Bank of Bombay -v- Nandlal Thackerseydas; PC 31-Oct-1912

Bombay

Court: PC
Date: 31-Oct-1912
Links: Bailii,
References: [1912] UKPC 73,

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth

Chesterfield -v- Harris; HL 1911

Court: HL
Date: 01-Jan-1911
References: [1911] AC 623,
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Land

The King -v- Pearson And Another; 19-Dec-1816

Date: 19-Dec-1816
Links: Commonlii,
References: [1816] EngR 870, (1816) 3 Price 288, (1816) 146 ER 264

Leave a Comment

Filed under Litigation Practice

Limpus -v- The London General Omnibus Company; 1861

Date: 01-Jan-1861
Links: Commonlii,
References: [1861] EngR 53, (1861) 2 F & F 640, (1861) 175 ER 1221
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Personal Injury, Vicarious Liability

OA193592012; AIT 21-Jul-2014

Court: AIT
Date: 21-Jul-2014
Links: Bailii,
References: [2014] UKAITUR OA193592012),

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immigration

Robert McBride Ltds Trade Mark Application; TMR 2003

The applicant sought to amend its application for a trade mark. The Appointed Person refused the application, emphasising that an applicant must specify his claim from the start. Geoffrey Hobbs QC said: ‘Amendment of a trade mark after registration has been applied for will not in general be possible under the proposed Community trade marks system, nor is it possible under the Madrid Agreement. Under the new law therefore it will not be possible to make such amendments. If the mark as filed is unregistrable it will be necessary to file a fresh application in order to register any amended version of the mark.’

Court: TMR
Date: 01-Jan-2003
Judges: Geoffrey Hobbs QC
References: [2003] RPC 19,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Intellectual Property

Regina -v- Gilbert; CACD 2003

The court reviewed a number of authorities which deal with the correct approach by the court when asked to receive evidence pursuant to section 23.

Court: CACD
Date: 01-Jan-2003
Statutes: Criminal Appeals Act 1968 23(1)
References: [2003] EWCA Crim 2385,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Crime

Regina -v- Fairley; CACD 2003

A section 37 order is not available to a court where a defendant has been found unfit to plead, with an additional finding fo fact that he had committed the act. That finding was not a finding of guilt.

Court: CACD
Date: 01-Jan-2003
Statutes: Mental Health Act 1983 37
References: [2003] EWCA Crim 1625,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Crime, Health

B -v- Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and the Lord Chancellor; CA 2003

On an application for an interim anti-social behaviour order, the court must consider whether the application for a final order has been properly made.

Court: CA
Date: 01-Jan-2003
Judges: Kennedy LJ
Statutes: Crime and Disorder Act 1998
References: [2003] 1 All ER 531,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Crime

Regina -v- M (KJ); CACD 2003

In appropriate cases, the court should take account of the fact, if it be such that ‘being unfit to plead, the defendant would have no realistic opportunity of going into the witness box and defend himself, nor to give coherent instructions to his advisers.’

Court: CACD
Date: 01-Jan-2003
References: [2003] 2 Cr App 322,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Crime

Thomas A Edison Ltd -v- Bock; 1912

(High Court of Australia) ‘There is a primary precept governing the administration of justice, that no man is to be condemned unheard; and therefore, as a general rule, no order should be made to the prejudice of a party unless he has the opportunity of being heard on defence.’

Date: 01-Jan-1912
References: (1912) 15 CLR 679,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth, Equity

Webster -v- Bosanquet; PC 1912

(Ceylon) The Board was asked whether a clause in a contract amounted to a penalty: ‘whatever be . . the expression used in the contract in describing the payment, the question must always be whether the construction contended for rendered the agreement unconscionable and extravagant, and one which no Court ought to allow to be enforced.’

Court: PC
Date: 01-Jan-1912
Judges: Lord Mersey
References: [1912] AC 394,
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth, Contract

Public Works Commissioner -v- Hills; PC 1906

(Cape of Good Hope) A railway construction contract provided that in the event of a breach by the contractor he should forfeit ‘as and for liquidated damages’ certain percentages retained by the Government of the Cape of Good Hope of money payable for work done as a guarantee fund to answer for defective work and also certain security money deposited with the Government. The amount of that retained money depended on the progress of contracts other than the one in suit.
Held: The clause was a penalty. The principle to be deduced from the Clydebank case was that the criterion of whether a sum was a penalty or damages was to be found in whether the sum in question ‘can or cannot be regarded as a ‘genuine pre-estimate of the creditor’s probable or possible interest in the due performance of the principal obligation.’ The question of whether a sum stipulated is penalty or liquidated damages is a question of construction to be decided upon the terms and inherent circumstances of each particular contract, judged of as at the time of the making of the contract, not as at the time of breach.
The Clydebank case was decided according to ‘the rules of a system of law where contract law was based directly on the civil law and no complications in the matter of pleading had ever been introduced by the separation of common law and equity.’

Court: PC
Date: 01-Jan-1906
Judges: Lord Dunedin
References: [1906] AC 368,
Cases Cited:
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth, Contract

Solomon -v- Solomon; 1912

(Australia – New South Wales) The fact that a party’s residence in New South Wales was unlawful, prevented the acquisition of a domicile of choice there. ‘It is a curious proposition that a Court of Justice in New South Wales should hold that a man has acquired a domicile in New South Wales when the laws of the land forbid that man to be here.’ The man’s Australian wife was unable to obtain a divorce from her husband, then in prison for rape, because he was a South Sea Islander who had come to and remained in Australia in defiance of laws which prohibited South Sea Islanders from doing so, and indeed had been on his way to be deported when he committed the offence for which he was then in prison.

Date: 01-Jan-1912
Judges: Gordon J
References: (1912) 29 WN(NSW) 68,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Administrative, Commonwealth

Lang -v- Webb; 1912

(High Court of Australia) In 1908 the deceased had transferred and conveyed a piece of land to each of her three sons; on the same date as, but subsequently to, the execution of the transfers and conveyances there had been executed by the deceased and each of her sons a lease back for a term of five years of the land which had been transferred and conveyed to him; and the transfers and conveyances and leases had been executed after discussion and arrangement between the deceased and her three sons and after she had explained to them that she desired to make fixed and permanent provision for them and at the same time to take from them leases at whatever might be a reasonable rental for grazing purposes having regard to the conditions of the leases, those conditions and the amounts of the rents having been discussed and agreed before the execution of any of the documents. The rents reserved were in each case fair and reasonable and after the execution of the documents the whole of the land continued to be occupied by the deceased and was used by her for grazing purposes. On the deceased’s death in 1910, before the expiration of the leases, a claim for death duties was made in respect of the freehold.
Held: The claim was upheld. Section 102 requires people to define what they give away what they retain. If an interest is given away, they may not receive back any benefits from that interest. The policy was to avoid the ‘delay, expense and uncertainty’ of requiring the revenue to investigate whether a gift was genuine or pretended. If the donor continued to derive any benefit from the property in which an interest had been given, it would be treated as a pretended gift unless the benefit could be shown to be referable to a specific proprietary interest which he had retained. This is probably the most plausible explanation. Isaacs J: ‘But there must be no misunderstanding as to what is meant by the transaction … in the relevant sense it means that you regard the substantial effect of the ‘conveyance, assignment, gift, delivery or transfer’, by which the gift was made. If by an instrument, as in this case, you look at the instrument by which the property passes from the donor to the donee, and, disregarding mere form, ascertain its real effect. What does it give, not how does it give it? In this case the gift is made by the indenture executed by Henrietta Lang, and by that the whole of her estate in the lands was given without any exception or reservation whatever. That was the transaction of gift – complete in itself and unqualified. No other construction is possible. It had to be complete before the donee could execute to her the lease of the property. A lease is a conveyance; and it is more than form, it is substance, when the donor’s interest has to be vested in the donee before the donee can convey a smaller interest. That smaller interest was comprised in the gift itself, it was part of it, and is quite different from the case of Re Cochrane , where the trust of surplus income and the ultimate contingent trust of corpus were expressly retained by the donor for himself on the face of the instrument, and never in any shape or form included in what he gave.’

Date: 01-Jan-1912
Judges: Griffith CJ, Barton and Isaacs JJ
Links: Austlii,
References: (1912) 13 CLR 503,
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Commonwealth, Taxes - Other

Limpus -v- London General Omnibus Company; CExC 23-Jun-1862

The driver of an omnibus, seeking to disturb the omnibus of another company, drove his own across the path of another. His employers had furnished him and other drivers with a card saying they ‘must not on any account race with or obstruct another omnibus.’ Baron Martin had directed the jury that, if the defendant’s driver did it for the purposes of his employer, the defendants were liable: but if it was an act of his own, and in order to effect a purpose of his own, the defendants were not responsible. The jury found for the plaintiff.
Held: The employer was liable for the ensuing accident despite written instructions to the driver to exercsie care. The employer was liable because the injury resulted from an act done by the driver in the course of his service and for his master’s purposes; it was not done by the servant for his own purposes, but for his master’s purposes.
Lord Blackburn said: ‘A footman might think it for the interest of his master to drive the coach, but no one could say that it was within the scope of the footman’s employment, and that the master would be liable for damage resulting from the wilful act of the footman in taking charge of the horses.’

Court: CExC
Date: 23-Jun-1862
Judges: Wiles J, Blackburn J
Links: Commonlii,
References: (1862) 1 H&C 526, [1862] EngR 839, (1862) 1 H & C 526, (1862) 158 ER 993
Cases Cited:
Cited By:
  • Rose -v- Plenty, CA, Cited, ([1976] 1 WLR 141, Bailii, [1975] EWCA Civ 5, [1976] 1 All ER 97, [1975] ICR 430)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Personal Injury, Vicarious Liability

Mitchell And His Wife, -v- Chrassweller and Another; 27-Jan-1853

A master is responsible for an injury resulting from the negligence of his servant whilst driving his cart or carriage, provided the servant is at the time engaged in his master’s business, even though the accident happens in a place to which his master’s business did not call him: but, if the journey upon which the servant starts be solely for his own purposes, and is undertaken without the knowledge or consent of his master, the latter is not responsible. The defendants’ carman, having finished the business of the day, returned to their shop in Welbeck Street, with their horse and cart, and obtained the key of the stable, which was close at hand; but, instead of going there at once, and putting up the horse, as it was his duty to do, he, without his masters’ knowledge or consent, drove a fellow workman to Euston Square ; and, in his way back, ran over and injured the plaintiff and his wife. Held, that, inasmuch as the carman was not at the time of the accident engaged in the business of his masters, they were not responsible for the consequences of his unauthorised act. The declaration alleged that ‘the defendants were possessed of a certain cart and horse, which was being driven by and under the care and direction of their servant,’ –not saying, at the time of the grievances complained of; and that, ‘whilst the plaintiff was crossing a certain street, &c., the defendants, by their servant, so negligently and improperty drove and directed the said cart and horse along the said street, that the plaintiff was knocked down and injured. Held, that the first allegation was immaterial, and not traversable ; and that, under (‘not guilty,” the defendants might shew that the driver was not at the time of the accident acting as their servant. Quaere, as to the power of the judge to add a plea at the trial, under the 222nd section of the common law procedure act, 15 & 16 Vict. c, 76.

Date: 27-Jan-1853
Links: Commonlii,
References: [1853] EngR 174, (1853) 13 CB 237, (1853) 138 ER 1189

Leave a Comment

Filed under Personal Injury, Vicarious Liability

Davidoff et Cle SA and Another -v- Gofkid Ltd; ECJ 9-Jan-2003

The claimant distributed cosmetics and other goods in Germany under the mark ‘Davidoff’, and the defendants used a similar registered mark for their own and similar goods. They sought protection under the directive.
Held: The directive explicitly provided a protection for the user of an earlier mark against the user of a later and similar mark where the goods themselves were dissimilar. Where there was no likelihood of confusion, there should be no protection. However, the Directive must be read in the light of the overall scheme and its objectives. The protection given to similar goods and services should be at least as strong as that for dissimilar services, and the Directive must be read accordingly.: ‘In view of its serious effect in extinguishing the exclusive rights of the proprietors of the trade marks in issue in the main proceedings . . consent must be so expressed that an intention to renounce those rights is unequivocally demonstrated.
Such intention will normally be gathered from an express statement of consent. Nevertheless, it is conceivable that consent may, in some cases, be inferred from facts and circumstances prior to, simultaneous with or subsequent to the placing of the goods on the market outside the EEA which, in the view of the national court, unequivocally demonstrate that the proprietor has renounced his rights.’

Court: ECJ
Date: 09-Jan-2003
Judges: Puissochet, Gulmann, Skouris, Macken, Colneric JJ
Statutes: Directive 89/104/EEC to approximate the laws of member states relating to trade marks, EU Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988
Links: Bailii,
References: Times, 22-Jan-2003, [2003] 1 WLR 1714, [2003] FSR 28, [2003] EUECJ C-292/00, C-292/00
Cited By:

Leave a Comment

Filed under European, Intellectual Property

Novartis Ag and Universtiy College London; Novartis Ag and Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology (Patent); IPO 12-Feb-2003

IPO Supplementary Protection Certificates – The co-applicants provided authorisations granted in Switzerland in support of their applications but reasoned that these authorisations extended to Liechtenstein and not the rest of the community such that the period of the certificates determined by Article 13(1) should not be calculated on the basis of these authorisations.
This was contrary to the examiner’s preliminary view. References to the first authorisation for placing the product on the market in the ‘Community’ as found in Article 8(1)(c) and 13(1) of the Regulation were considered to have been adapted by point 8 of Protocol 1 to the European Economic Area (‘EEA’) agreement. Adapted references to ‘Community’ being understood as references to territories of the contracting parties to the EEA agreement. Since Liechtenstein’s accession to the EEA a marketing authorisation granted by the Swiss authorities but immediately effective in Liechtenstein under its Heilmittelgezetz (‘HMG’) law was considered an authorisation in the Community and thus capable of determining the duration of the certificates.
The hearing officer concluded:
Point 8 of Protocol 1 on horizontal adaptations to the Agreement applies to Article 13(1) of the EEA version of the Regulation in such a way that the reference in that Article to the territory of the ‘Community’ should be understood as a reference to the territories of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement. Thus, an authorization to place a medicinal product on the market, granted in accordance with the national legislation of an EEA/EFTA State, is relevant for the purposes of Article 13(1) of the Regulation if it is the first in the EEA;
a marketing authorization, granted by the Swiss authorities but effective in Liechtenstein under its HMG law, can be relevant for the purpose of Article 13(1) of the Regulation even though Annex 10 to Decision No. 1/95 of the EEA Council requires that Liechtenstein shall not deliver certificates for medicinal products as laid down in the Regulation; and the adaptation to Annex II to the Agreement made by EEA Council Decision No. 1/95, which requires that the provisions on the free movement of goods contained in the Agreement or in acts referred to shall be applicable to exports from Liechtenstein to the other Contracting Parties only to products in conformity with the acts referred to in Annex II, has no bearing on the question whether a marketing authorization in accordance with Liechtenstein’s HMG law should be relevant for the purpose of determining the duration of a certificate in another EEA Member State in accordance with Article 13(1) of the Regulation.
Accordingly the Hearing Officer found the Swiss authorisations admitted by the co-applicants should determine the duration of the certificates by virtue of their effect in Liechtenstein.

Court: IPO
Date: 12-Feb-2003
Judges: Mr R Walker
Statutes: Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1768/92 13(1)
Links: Bailii,
References: SPC/GB/00/013, SPC/GB/99/012, [2003] UKIntelP o04403

Leave a Comment

Filed under European, Intellectual Property