The parties were in dispute over the management of a trust. One sought an injunction restraining the other from publishing allegations of breach of trust.
Held: In the unusual circumstances, an order could be made. The claimant had put forward very detailed evidence that the allegations complained of were untrue, and none of the defendants had said they would be relying on a defence of justification or any other substantive defence.
Tugendhat J
[2011] EWHC 476 (QB)
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham and Others QBD 11-Apr-2013
The claimant sought an order to restrain anticipated defamatory comments and evidence to be given to an employment tribunal.
Held: It could not be said as the claimant asserted that dfeences were bound to fail, and no determination should be . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 26 October 2021; Ref: scu.430504