The Respondent argued that each Appellant was properly excluded from reliance on (and the benefit of) the United Nations Refugee Convention 1951 as their differing activities were sufficient to satisfy the test in Article 1F(c) of the Convention: each ‘has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations’.
Citations:
[2018] EWCA Civ 933, [2018] WLR(D) 259
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Immigration
Updated: 20 April 2022; Ref: scu.614913