S challenged the decision of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal that the school had not failed to ensure the return of his son to school within the academic year.
Held:The weight to be attached to any particular evidence ‘is essentially a matter for the Tribunal, unless the approach can be shown to be so illogical as to be irrational or perverse’.
Judges:
Dobbs J
Citations:
[2008] EWHC 1196 (Admin)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – DC v London Borough of Ealing UTAA 11-Jan-2010
Tribunal procedure and practice (including UT) – statements of reasons . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Education, Litigation Practice
Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270067