EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Polkey deduction
The Tribunal wrong to reject Polkey in view of genuineness of redundancy and that respondents would have been in the pool.
Citations:
[2008] UKEAT 0348 – 08 – 1609
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews etc EAT 17-Jan-2007
EAT Four employees successfully established before the Employment Tribunal that they had been unfairly dismissed for redundancy. The Tribunal found that there had been procedural defects. In particular the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.278804