Whitby v Secretary for Transport and Others: CA 6 May 2016

The court considered the meaning and effect of government policy in paragraphs 132 and 133 of the National Planning Policy Framework (‘the NPPF’) for decision-making on proposed development that would harm the ‘significance of a designated heritage asset’, and, in the context of a project for the construction of a new railway, the decision-maker’s approach to a suggested alternative alignment.

Simon, Lindblom, Hamblen LJJ
[2016] EWCA Civ 444
Bailii
England and Wales

Planning

Updated: 01 November 2021; Ref: scu.563145