Walter v De Richemont, Commonly Called Le Vicomte De Richemont: 18 Nov 1844

A defendant arrested on capias upon a Judge’s order, under stat. 1 and 2 Vict c, 110, s. 3, is supersedeable unless the plaintiff proceed to execution within two terms inciusive after judgment, conformably to R Hil. 2 W. 4, I. 85. And, where judgment in debt was signed for want of a plea: Held, that the time ran from such signing, although the costs were not taxed.

Citations:

[1844] EngR 982, (1844) 6 QB 544, (1844) 115 ER 204

Links:

Commonlii

Litigation Practice

Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.305574