The claimant alleged infringement of its patent for certain airline seats.
Held: The defendant’s aircraft seating system did not infringe its EP (UK) 1,495,908 patent.
Judges:
Lewison J
Citations:
[2009] EWHC 26 (Pat), [2009] ECDR 11, (2009) 32(4) IPD 32031
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Halliburton Energy Services, Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd and others PatC 21-Jul-2005
A claim was made for a method of design in which certain calculations were to be carried out recursively, modifying the results each time until a particular criterion was satisfied. Though the method was susceptible of solution by computer, but the . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd CA 22-Oct-2009
. .
Appeal from – Virgin Atlantic v Premium Aircraft CA 21-Dec-2009
. .
See Also – Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd and Another CA 23-Feb-2011
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.280074