Patent challenge for obviousness, and patent infringement.
Held: i) the patent was not infringed;
ii) the patent was valid;
iii) there was no fresh UDR arising from minor changes made to the design of the Ultralite 500 in 1995;
iv) there was no infringement of design right in the components;
v) but there was infringement by the Pinnacle 500 panels themselves and by the whole assembled Pinnacle 500 product.
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Lewison
Citations:
[2004] 1785 EWHC (Ch)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Eurocell Building Plastics Ltd& Another CA 24-Jun-2005
Appeal against finding of non-infringement of patent. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 09 December 2022; Ref: scu.199490