Tozlukaya v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 6 Oct 2005

Judges:

Andrew Nicol QC

Citations:

[2005] EWHC 2863 (Admin)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromTozlukaya v Secretary of State for the Home Department CA 11-Apr-2006
Richards LJ said: ‘There is no dispute about the test to be applied by the Secretary of State in determining whether the respondent’s claim was ‘clearly unfounded’ within section 93(2) (b) of the 2002 Act. In relation to the same statutory language . .
CitedRainford, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Admn 17-Oct-2008
The claimant had been in England since he was 11, and was now 38. He had been repeatedly convicted. He had challenged a deportation notice on a human rights basis. He now challenged a certificate that this claim was manifestly ill founded.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 13 May 2022; Ref: scu.236625