Tioxide Europe Limited v CGU International Insurance Plc and others: QBD 23 Sep 2004

Claim under two excess global liability policies for indemnity against its liability for the ‘pinking’ of UPVC products manufactured and sold by others which included in their formulation a titanium dioxide pigment supplied by Tioxide. Excess layer insurance policies.
The Honourable Mr Justice Langley
[2004] EWHC 2116 (Comm)
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal fromTioxide Europe Ltd v CGU International Plc and others CA 20-Jul-2005
The court considered how an insurance contract should be construed. Langley J said: ‘The general principle is that the proper construction is to be determined by the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in the contractual and commercial . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 19 July 2021; Ref: scu.214301