The company appealed against the sentence imposed on a finding that it was in breach of the 2010 Regulations. It sought to bring new evidence.
Held: In sentencing appeals the court will scrutinise intensely any application to give a factual explanation that was not before the sentencing court. The terms of the Criminal Practice Direction make clear the procedure which should be followed in relation to establishing the factual basis for sentencing.
Mitting J
[2015] EWCA Crim 960, [2015] 2 Cr App R (S) 63, [2015] WLR(D) 244, [2015] Crim LR 739, [2015] 1 WLR 4411, [2015] EWCA Crim 960, [2015] Env LR 36
Bailii
Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 38(1)(a) 39(1)
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Rogers, Regina v CACD 1-Jul-2016
The court was asked as to as to the circumstances in which s.23 of the 1968 Act applies to fresh evidence or other information which an appellant may seek to adduce before this court on an appeal against sentence.
Held: The rules applicable to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Sentencing, Criminal Practice
Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.547541