Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd Arrow Generics Ltd, Generics (UK) Ltd v Istituto Gentili Spa, Merck and Co Inc: PatC 22 Jan 2003

The Hon Mr Justice Jacob
[2003] EWHC 5 (Patent)
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedBrugger v Medic-Aid Ltd (No 2) ChD 1996
B alleged infringement by M of its patented nebulizer. M replied saying that the claims failed for obviousness. Features of the nebulizer were admittedly old and well known, but the claimant asserted a new mechanism which reduced the size of the . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromIstituto Gentili Spa Merck and Co Inc v Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Arrow Generics Ltd Generics UK Ltd CA 6-Nov-2003
When a party appealed a patent judge’s conclusions as to obviousness of a patent under challenge, that party should put before the court a summary showing succinctly what principles of law the judge had infringed. . .
CitedAngiotech Pharmaceuticals and Another v Conor Medsystems Inc CA 16-Jan-2007
The appellants challenged a finding that their patent for a vascular stent failed for obviousness.
Held: To overcome a judge’s finding in such a case some error of principle had to be shown. No such error was shown and the appeal failed. . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property

Updated: 04 January 2022; Ref: scu.178800