EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Time for appealing
The Appellant was one and 16 days late in lodging a Notice of Appeal against two interim case management orders. He was articulate and assiduous in legal research on tribunal procedure. No exceptional reason was found to extend time. Harper v Hopkins applied.
Judges:
McMullen QC J
Citations:
[2010] UKEAT 0274 – 10 – 1811
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Harper and Another v Hopkins CA 12-Oct-2010
The appellants appealed against refusal by the EAT of an extension of time for them to appeal.
Held: The court could take some account of the prospects of success in deciding whether to extend time. . .
Cited – Sian v Abbey National Plc EAT 25-Jun-2003
EAT Practice and Procedure – Time for appealing . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 03 September 2022; Ref: scu.430640