Stuart Morrison and Seetru Limited (Patent): IPO 28 Aug 2007

In decision BL O/133/07 the hearing officer found the patent invalid for lack of novelty and inventive step. The Defendant was given two months to file amendments and both parties were given the same period to make submissions on costs. No amendments were submitted and the patent was revoked. The Claimant, as the successful party, made no submissions on costs so no order for costs was made.

Citations:

[2007] UKIntelP o24907

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Intellectual Property

Updated: 20 October 2022; Ref: scu.456767