VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – Requirement for security under para. 4(2)(a), Sch. 11, VATA – Poor VAT compliance record of the Appellant combined with loss of VAT from businesses with which a director of the Appellant was associated – Held, the requirement had not been shown to be unreasonable – Appeal dismissed
References: [2009] UKVAT V20968
Links: Bailii
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 24 September 2020; Ref: scu.346545