EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION: Reasonable adjustments
Effect of Malcolm: on the facts of the case the decision in Malcolm did not make any difference to the conclusion. There is no requirement in law to set out a decision by reference to Berriman when dealing with failure to make reasonable adjustments so long as the statutory requirements are met. On the facts the decision was Meek compliant.
Reid QC J
[2009] UKEAT 0360 – 08 – 0903
Bailii
Disability Discrimination Act 1995
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Environment Agency v Rowan EAT 1-Nov-2007
EAT Practice and Procedure – Perversity
Disability discrimination – Reasonable adjustments
An Employment Tribunal considering a claim that an employer has discriminated against an employee pursuant to . .
Cited – Dundee City Council v Malcolm EAT 25-Jul-2008
EAT SEX DISCRIMINATION: Vicarious liability
Sexual harassment claim by an employee of an education authority. Circumstances in which tribunal had misdirected itself as to its own prior judgment and erred in . .
Cited – Smiths Detection – Watford Ltd v Berriman EAT 9-Aug-2005
EAT The Employment Tribunal was wrong to find that the Respondent had discriminated against the Claimant under Section 6(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 because it omitted to find what arrangements . .
Cited – London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm HL 25-Jun-2008
The tenant had left his flat and sublet it so as to allow the landlord authority an apparently unanswerable claim for possession. The authority appealed a finding that they had to take into account the fact that the tenant was disabled and make . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 28 June 2021; Ref: scu.317869