Stack v AJAT-Tec Ltd: EAT 8 Jul 2011

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Worker, employee or neither
Employment Judge wrongly held that claimant could not as a matter of law be party to a contract, either of service or for services, in circumstances where the amount of his remuneration had not been agreed – Way v Latilla and Currencies Direct Ltd v Ellis referred to.

Judges:

Underhill P J

Citations:

[2011] UKEAT 0527 – 10 – 0807

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedWay v Latilla HL 1937
Mr Way (W), the plaintiff, was employed by Ariston, which had mining operations in Africa, as a consulting engineer and manager. He met the respondent (L) in England. He was asked to seek options to acquire concessions the respondent might acquire. . .
CitedCurrencies Direct Ltd v Ellis QBD 19-Oct-2001
The fact that a loan to a director was unlawful did not prevent a company seeking to recover or enforce the loan. A transaction made in contravention of section 330 was voidable at the instance of the company. The implication of section 341 was that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 16 September 2022; Ref: scu.441844