The SRA challenged an anonymity direction given on conclusion of a complaint hearing against the respondent
Judges:
Burnett LJ, Nicol J
Citations:
[2016] EWHC 37 (Admin), [2016] WLR(D) 12, [2016] 1 Costs LR 35, [2016] 4 WLR 16
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Lu v Solicitors Regulation Authority Admn 6-Jul-2022
No Unmnecessary Anoniymity
The appellant, having been acquitted of misconduct, complained of the anonymisation of various partied by the SDT.
Held: The court was critical of the approach taken by the Tribunal. ‘I see no good reason why Ms Pearson, Ms Stone, Mr Ewing and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Legal Professions, Costs
Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.558735