Smithkline Beecham Plc and Another v Apotex Europe Ltd and others: CA 14 Feb 2003

Patent infringement claim.

Aldous LJ, carnwath LJ, Sir Christopher Staunton
[2003] EWCA Civ 137, [2003] FSR 31
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal fromSmithkline Beecham Plc, Glaxosmithkline UK Limited v Apotex Europe Limited, Neolab Limited, Waymade Healthcare Plc PatC 28-Nov-2002
Claim for patent infringement – grant of interim injunction to prevent sales by the defendants of a drug pending trial of the action. . .
See AlsoSmithkline Beecham Plc and Another v Apotex Europe Ltd and others Patc 4-Feb-2003
. .

Cited by:
CitedLes Laboratoires Servier and Another v Apotex Inc and others ChD 9-Oct-2008
The claimant had alleged that the defendant was producing generic drugs which infringed its rights in a new drug. The patentee had given a cross-undertaking in damages, but the patent was later ruled invalid. The court had to assess the damages to . .
See AlsoApotex Europe Ltd and others v Smithkline Beecham Plc and Another Patc 11-Mar-2003
. .
See AlsoApotex Europe Ltd and others v Beecham Group Plc and Another Patc 6-Jun-2003
Application by Apotex, to have the trial of an application for declarations of non-infringement heard at the same time as the trial of two other proceedings. . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property

Updated: 13 January 2022; Ref: scu.179654