Teare J considered the without prejudice rule: ‘In my judgment an exception can only be allowed where it is of the same character as one already established or where it is an incremental but principled extension of an existing exception, as was the exception in Oceanbulk v TMT.’
Judges:
Teare J
Citations:
[2018] EWHC 1763 (Comm)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Briggs and Others v Clay and Others ChD 25-Feb-2019
Defendants’ application to exclude evidence said to be ‘without prejudice’ The case concerned a pension scheme for employees within a group of companies. In a prior action by way of a Part 8 claim brought by the trustees of the scheme, the court had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Insurance, Litigation Practice
Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.619842