Secretary of State for the Home Department v GG: Admn 12 Feb 2009

A control order under the 2005 Act could not include a right for officers to conduct a personal search. However a 16-hour per day curfew together with a relocation from Derby to Chesterfield and which presented no difficulties for family visits was upheld.

Judges:

Collins J

Citations:

[2009] EWHC 142 (Admin)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromSecretary of State for the Home Department v GG CA 23-Jul-2009
The defendant challenged the inclusion in a control order of an order to submit to personal searches. The Secretary of State appealed against a refusal of the order to ermit the searches.
Held: The appeal failed. Such orders were made solely . .
CitedSecretary of State for The Home Department v AP SC 16-Jun-2010
The claimant challenged the terms of the control order made against him under the 2005 Act saying that it was too restrictive. Though his family was in London, the control order confined him to a house many miles away for 16 hours a day.
Held: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.282628