Click the case name for better results:

Cornick, Regina v: QBD 3 Nov 2014

The defendant had been convicted of murdering his schoolteacher. The court now gave reasons, at the end of the case for discontinuing the order restricting his being named. Orders protecting the identities of children witnesses were continued. Judges: Coulson J Citations: [2014] EWHC 3623 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Children and Young Persons Act 1933 39, … Continue reading Cornick, Regina v: QBD 3 Nov 2014

Burnip v Birmingham City Council and Another: CA 15 May 2012

The court considered an allegation of discrimination in the application of housing benefit for a disabled person. Held: The claimants had established a prima facie case of discrimination under Article 14 of the ECHR, and that the Secretary of State had failed to establish objective and reasonable justification for the discriminatory effect of the statutory … Continue reading Burnip v Birmingham City Council and Another: CA 15 May 2012

Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council v O’Sullivan and another: CA 25 Mar 2003

The council granted a tenancy to the husband many years ago. At various times the couple split up then came back together. The husband was rehoused, but at the time misled the council to say his wife was not living in the flat. When the council sought a possession order, she alleged the action was … Continue reading Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council v O’Sullivan and another: CA 25 Mar 2003

Rodzevillo v Ukraine: ECHR 14 Jan 2016

Citations: 38771/05 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Fifth Section)), [2016] ECHR 74 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Cited by: See also – Rodzevillo v Ukraine ECHR 17-Dec-2019 ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Fifth Section Committee . . Lists of cited by and … Continue reading Rodzevillo v Ukraine: ECHR 14 Jan 2016

A NHS Foundation Trust v Ms X (By Her Litigation Friend, The Official Solicitor): CoP 8 Oct 2014

X suffered both severe anorexia and alcoholism. She had in the past been repeatedly and compulsorily admitted to hospital for treatment, but her doctors considered that whilst this might be life extending treatment it had proved ineffective and unethical. They sought a declaration that they may not be obliged to offer the treatment again. The … Continue reading A NHS Foundation Trust v Ms X (By Her Litigation Friend, The Official Solicitor): CoP 8 Oct 2014

Na v Finland: ECHR 14 Nov 2019

ECHR Judgment : Right to life : First Section ECHR Judgment : Inadmissible : First Section Citations: 25244/18, [2019] ECHR 814, [2021] ECHR 631 Links: Bailii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 17 October 2022; Ref: scu.646711

Hamalainen v Finland: ECHR 16 Jul 2014

Grand Chamber Citations: 37359/09 – Grand Chamber Judgment, [2014] ECHR 787, [2014] ECHR 974, [2015] 1 FCR 379 Links: Bailii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Citing: Legal Summary – Hamalainen v Finland ECHR 16-Jul-2014 ECHR Grand Chamber – Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Refusal to … Continue reading Hamalainen v Finland: ECHR 16 Jul 2014

Kenward and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v The Director of Public Prosecutions and Another: Admn 4 Dec 2015

The claimants challenged the policy issued by the DPP on assisted suicide following the Nicklinson case. Held: The request for judicial review was refused. Sir Brian Leveson P said: ‘It is important not to misunderstand the effect either of the policy or the impact of the amendment to the policy introduced by the DPP. The … Continue reading Kenward and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v The Director of Public Prosecutions and Another: Admn 4 Dec 2015

Serife Yigit v Turkey: ECHR 20 Jan 2005

A complaint as to the privileging of civil over religious marriages in Turkey was found admissible.‘ the essential object of Article 8 is to protect the individual against arbitrary interference by the public authorities. There may in addition be positive obligations inherent in effective ‘respect’ for family life. In both contexts regard must be had … Continue reading Serife Yigit v Turkey: ECHR 20 Jan 2005

Vasilevskiy And Others v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Committee Citations: 25655/20, [2022] ECHR 707 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681108

Dichko And Others v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Committee Citations: 33724/14, [2022] ECHR 693 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681077

Khryapko v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Third Section Committee Citations: 26190/08, [2022] ECHR 687 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681085

Frolov And Others v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 15394/19, [2022] ECHR 711 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681078

Korablevy And Others v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 32627/17, [2022] ECHR 698 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681087

Murzina And Averina v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 72855/14, [2022] ECHR 694 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681092

Litvinov v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings : Third Section Committee Citations: 6890/13, [2022] ECHR 690 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681089

Puzanov v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Committee Citations: 26895/14, [2022] ECHR 692 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681096

Kuznetsov And Others v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 43853/18, [2022] ECHR 706 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681088

Rabczewska v Poland: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 10 – Freedom of expression-{general} : First Section Citations: 8257/13, [2022] ECHR 680 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681097

Timokhin And Others v Russia: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 6510/21, [2022] ECHR 716 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681105

M.K v Ukraine: ECHR 15 Sep 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Fifth Section Citations: 24867/13, [2022] ECHR 686 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681091

SC v The United Kingdom: ECHR 14 Sep 2011

Citations: [2011] ECHR 1670, 60958/00 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Citing: See Also – SC v The United Kingdom ECHR 15-Jun-2004 Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) – claim rejected ; … Continue reading SC v The United Kingdom: ECHR 14 Sep 2011

SC v The United Kingdom: ECHR 15 Jun 2004

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) – claim rejected ; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient ; … Continue reading SC v The United Kingdom: ECHR 15 Jun 2004

Dorokhov v Russia: ECHR 14 Feb 2008

Citations: 66802/01, [2008] ECHR 151 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 12 October 2022; Ref: scu.264611

Ashlarba v Georgia: ECHR 15 Jul 2014

ECHR Article 7-1 Nullum crimen sine lege Use of undefined colloquial expression in definition of criminal offence: no violation Facts – In 2005 the Georgian legislature created a series of new offences designed to assist in the fight against organised crime. As part of a wider legislative package Article 223(1) of the Criminal Code was … Continue reading Ashlarba v Georgia: ECHR 15 Jul 2014

Zornic v Bosnia and Herzegovina: ECHR 15 Jul 2014

ECHR Article 46-2 Execution of judgment Measures of a general character Respondent State required to establish without delay political system in which all citizens have the right to stand for elections without discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Ineligibility to stand for election without declaration of affiliation to one of constitutionally defined ‘constituent peoples’: violation Article 1 … Continue reading Zornic v Bosnia and Herzegovina: ECHR 15 Jul 2014

Whitefield v General Medical Council: PC 14 Nov 2002

The doctor had been allowed to continue in practice only on condition that he did not drink alcohol and that he complied with other conditions to support that restriction. He challenged it as an infringement of his human rights. Held: The conditions were in pursuit of a legitimate aim, and in the wider interest of … Continue reading Whitefield v General Medical Council: PC 14 Nov 2002

Mitin v Ukraine: ECHR 14 Feb 2008

Citations: 38724/02, [2008] ECHR 155 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 October 2022; Ref: scu.264621