The claimant sought to quash the IAT refusal of leave to appeal a Special Adjudicator’s decision, which had found no exceptional compassionate circumstances. She was a British Overseas Citizen seeking to be united with her family. She asserted that the test applied was too stringent in the light of the Human Rights Act.
Held: The cases indicated no inconsistency between the policies applied and the applicant’s article 8 rights.
Citations:
[2001] EWHC Admin 390
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Mahmood CA 8-Dec-2000
A Pakistani citizen entered the UK illegally and claimed asylum. A week before his claim was refused and he was served with removal directions, he married a British citizen of Pakistani origin. Two children were later born.
Held: Only . .
Cited – Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Peter Isiko; Susan and Shemy Isiko CA 20-Dec-2000
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration, Human Rights
Updated: 29 May 2022; Ref: scu.140312
