Sattar v Speyhill Ltd and Another: EAT 13 Nov 2013

EAT Transfer of Undertakings : Continuity of Employment – TUPE. The claimant claimed that his employment had been transferred from one employer to another, and that the TUPE regulations applied. The respondent argued that he was self employed. Held that the ET had not erred in law in deciding that the claimant was self employed and that the regulations did not apply. The weight to put on evidence, and the decision that evidence was credible, was a matter for the ET.

Lady Stacey
[2013] UKEAT 0030 – 13 – 1311
Bailii
England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 28 November 2021; Ref: scu.520035