Sankey v Nalco Diversified Technology Ltd: EAT 19 Nov 2001

The applicant appealed a decision that he had not been unfairly dismissed. He had had an expense card, but repeatedly, and after due warning, failed to make proper deductions for private mileage.
Held: The claimant should have known the change in his employment conditions which required these deductions. There was evidence before the tribunal which could found their decision, and the appeal tribunal could not substitute its own opinion.

Judges:

His Honour Judge D M Levy Qc

Citations:

[2001] UKEAT 888 – 00 – 1911

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoSankey v Nalco Diversified Technology Ltd EAT 23-Jan-2001
. .

Cited by:

See AlsoSankey v Nalco Diversified Technology Ltd EAT 23-Jan-2001
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 14 June 2022; Ref: scu.204552