Each supermarket company and the authority owned part of the site. The authority had granted each an outline permission for a new store, but had decided to allow the Tesco store to proceed. The claimant had at one point indicated that it did not wish to go ahead. The claimant now challenged the associated compulsory purchase order.
Held: The court dismissed the application for judicial review of the compulsory purchase decision.
Judges:
Elias J
Citations:
[2009] EWHC 134 (Admin)
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Wolverhampton City Council CA 31-Jul-2009
The council wanted to exercise its powers of compulsory purchase so as to allow them to acquire the claimant’s land to go toward the completion of the development of a competitor’s proposed supermarket. The claimant sought judicial review, saying . .
Appeal from – Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Wolverhampton City Council CA 31-Jul-2009
The council wanted to exercise its powers of compulsory purchase so as to allow them to acquire the claimant’s land to go toward the completion of the development of a competitor’s proposed supermarket. The claimant sought judicial review, saying . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Planning, Land
Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.280426