Rustamova v Calder High School: EAT 14 Nov 2013

EAT Practice and Procedure : Appellate Jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke – Case remitted to same Employment Tribunal for Meek compliant reasons, the original ET decision being that of the majority lay members, by first EAT.
Further reasons then produced, following a further ET hearing and signed by lay members but not the Employment Judge. No Judgment/reasons complying with requirement they should be signed by EJ (ET Rules 2004, rr29(1); 30(4)).
Case sent back under Burns-Barke procedure for further reasons to be drafted and signed by EJ, with approval of lay members.

Peter Clark J
[2013] UKEAT 0214 – 13 – 1411
Bailii
England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 26 November 2021; Ref: scu.518726