‘The Sheriff Principal having resumed consideration of the cause Refuses the appeal and Adheres to the interlocutor of the sheriff dated 4 September 2003; Certifies the appeal as suitable for the employment of junior counsel; Finds the defender and appellant liable to the pursuer and respondent in the expenses of the appeal procedure; Allows an account thereof to be given in and Remits same when lodged to the auditor of court to tax and to report thereon; thereafter Remits to the sheriff to proceed as accords.’
Judges:
Sheriff Principal B A Kerr
Citations:
[2005] ScotSC 15
Links:
Jurisdiction:
Scotland
Citing:
See Also – Van Overwaele v Hacking and Paterson for Recall of an Award of Sequestration SCS 8-Aug-2001
. .
See Also – Van Overwaele v Hacking and Paterson and Another ScS 22-Apr-2004
. .
Cited by:
See Also – Van Overwaele, Re Interdict SCS 10-Dec-2009
Petition for interdict in which the petitioner for the most part has been a party litigant. The petition arises out of the sequestration of the petitioner in January 2000 and she seeks to interdict the respondent, the permanent trustee, from seizing . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Costs
Updated: 18 November 2022; Ref: scu.224672