If a covenant was given for the benefit of the whole of a parcel of freehold land, the presumption was that the covenant did not enure for the benefit of subdivided parts of that land unless a development scheme applied to the land
Buckley J
[1964] 1 Ch 38
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Bath Rugby Ltd v Greenwood and Others CA 21-Dec-2021
This appeal concerns the question whether an area of land in Bath known as the Recreation Ground, commonly called ‘the Rec’, is still subject to a restrictive covenant imposed in a conveyance of the Rec dated 6 April 1922 (‘the 1922 conveyance’). . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Land
Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.670645