Rotrust Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd: CA 17 Apr 2018

Whether the refusal to a tenant of permission to apply for planning permission for change of use of premises was unreasonable. The covenant required the landlord not to withhold consent unreasonably. The landlord feared that this would lead to the tenant being able to apply to purchase the freehold.

Judges:

Sir Terence Etherton MR, McCombe, Lindblom LJJ

Citations:

[2018] EWCA Civ 765, [2018] Ch 603, [2018] 2 P and CR 16, [2018] WLR(D) 240, [2018] 2 P and CR DG1, [2018] L and TR 21, [2018] 3 WLR 1

Links:

Bailii, WLRD

Statutes:

Leasehold Reform Act 1967

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeaal fromSequent Nominees Ltd (Formerly Rotrust Nominees Ltd) v Hautford Ltd SC 30-Oct-2019
The tenant promised in the lease not to apply for any planning permission without the consent of the landlord, not to be unreasonably withheld. The tenant wished to apply for planning permission for a change of use of part of the demised premises, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 27 August 2022; Ref: scu.608727