Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd: EAT 6 May 2022

HEALTH and SAFETY
On the facts of this case, the employment tribunal did not err in law in concluding that the claimant’s dismissal when he did not return to work because of concerns related to the Coronavirus pandemic was not automatically unfair pursuant to section 100(1)(d) ERA. Sub-sections 100(1)(d) and (e) ERA considered.

Citations:

[2022] EAT 69

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.677564