Riverside Echg v Ubredi: EAT 18 Jul 2012

EW

EAT Victimisation Discrimination : Protected Disclosure – Employment Tribunal, by a majority decision, found that the First Respondent had committed an act of racial victimisation against the Claimant and awarded the Claimant compensation including interest in the sum of andpound;4,021.67 for injury to feelings. Appeal allowed on basis findings of fact made by majority that the First Respondent had failed to properly investigate allegations of victimisation and race discrimination perverse. EAT agreed with view of the Employment Judge set out in his minority judgment. In addition the majority misapplied the law as it relates to victimisation. Failure by ET to explain basis on which conclusions reached.

Judges:

Supperstone J

Citations:

[2012] UKEAT 0624 – 11 – 1807

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 05 November 2022; Ref: scu.464950